|
|
|
|
#1
10-09-2005, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
1. party has 10 tables now. dream of us multitablers.
2. party has BJ so they will be attracting alot more fishes. 3. party will increase its promotion so we can expect alot more advertisements and other sorts of promotions to bring in new fishes. 4. for those of you who are whining about rakeback. you guys have to understand that party DOES have rakeback but you just have to work hard in finding it. it might not be a 30%+ rakeback but im sure we can find a 25%+. i play about 1000 55's a month and also 109's in ocasion at 33% and 30% i will be effected but the influx of fishes party will bring i think makes it a necessity to go there. am i missing something? "when the fish leaves the water, the sharks will learn to walk the land" 
|
|
#2
10-09-2005, 12:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this true. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
[ QUOTE ]
1. party has 10 tables now. dream of us multitablers. why? before you couldve easily played ten tables, just using multiple skins. 2. party has BJ so they will be attracting alot more fishes. this is equalized my the poker fish who decide to play bj. 3. party will increase its promotion so we can expect alot more advertisements and other sorts of promotions to bring in new fishes. meh, if you say so. 4. for those of you who are whining about rakeback. you guys have to understand that party DOES have rakeback but you just have to work hard in finding it. it might not be a 30%+ rakeback but im sure we can find a 25%+. i play about 1000 55's a month and also 109's in ocasion at 33% and 30% i will be effected but the influx of fishes party will bring i think makes it a necessity to go there.? what does this have to do with it being good? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#4
10-09-2005, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
party poker doesn't have trackers for rakeback....
|
|
#6
10-09-2005, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
YES THEY DO, you can get rakeback on pp, JUST MANUALLY TYPE INFO IN IN THE ADDRESS BAR, oh wait, I bet I'm one of the only affiliates that has it saved.
(DO NOT PM ME, I DO NOT GIVE RAKEBACK NOR AM I INTERESTED IN DOING IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) I just do it to get my own pp rakeback.
|
|
#7
10-09-2005, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
don't jump at the new BJ and sidebet changes as good to bring in fishes. if you actually thought about what these things do, you might realize there is a strong chance it will LOSE us lots of fishes
furthermore, you can't get the unmentionable anywhere that doesnt blatantly violate partys T/C and it'll certainly eventually get shut down unless party changes thier attitudes i do agree there'll be a lot more competition between sites and this is good for the Bwhores
|
|
#8
10-09-2005, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
[ QUOTE ]
don't jump at the new BJ and sidebet changes as good to bring in fishes. if you actually thought about what these things do, you might realize there is a strong chance it will LOSE us lots of fishes [/ QUOTE ] I don't think this will be so bad. The fish will play a game in which they are only a slight underdog as opposed to poker where they stand almost no chance. Maybe win a bit and then go gamble at the poker table.
|
|
#9
10-09-2005, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
[ QUOTE ]
think this will be so bad. The fish will play a game in which they are only a slight underdog as opposed to poker where they stand almost no chance. Maybe win a bit and then go gamble at the poker table. [/ QUOTE ] It's a -EV game. The fish will collectively lose net money on BJ. This means less money on the tables for them to lose to us. Put it this way: Joe Fish decides to gamble online tonight. Do you want his first chance to lose money be on BJ or at the poker table? If he does BJ first, the odds are not on his getting to the poker table with more money to lose to 2+2ers.
|
|
#10
10-09-2005, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought this through. This wont be as bad as we are making this.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] think this will be so bad. The fish will play a game in which they are only a slight underdog as opposed to poker where they stand almost no chance. Maybe win a bit and then go gamble at the poker table. [/ QUOTE ] It's a -EV game. The fish will collectively lose net money on BJ. This means less money on the tables for them to lose to us. Put it this way: Joe Fish decides to gamble online tonight. Do you want his first chance to lose money be on BJ or at the poker table? If he does BJ first, the odds are not on his getting to the poker table with more money to lose to 2+2ers. [/ QUOTE ] ya but if joe fish was not a poker player at all but a black jack player he would have never been here. BJ allows the other BJ fishes to come here and try out poker. thus giving us more fishes.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
