#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
I think this is a bad cold-call. You need to be very sure that you will get a multi-way pot. If you are wrong too often, it will cost you.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
I'm not tight-passive, but I don't often see the fields I like when coldcalling with QJs. Danger of being dominated from a standard TAG is pretty high, and I don't often see a situation where I coldcall with it and the field is going to make my draws profitable.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
Yeah, I don't really like this one.
You're almost definitely crushed by UTG+1 and you'll have poor relative position for the rest of the hand. You can't count on lots of other people coming in. I don't think being able to play your draw aggressively is that big a deal unless UTG+1 will actually fold hands that beat you instead of just calling down. I'd be way more happy with it if UTG+1 raised, the fish called, then you called. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
I don't like the call. What are the most likely hands for the weak-tighty to have? AA-TT, AK-AJ, maybe KQ. Most of those dominate you, and having an aggressive third player in the pot only helps a little.
Say the flop comes Jxx or Qxx and the weak-tighty leads. Do you call/raise/fold? Calling sucks, because the aggressive player behind you will raise alot. Raising sucks, because you are now putting in alot of money with a hand that is probably a big dog to the weak-tighty. Folding sucks because you could very well be in the lead. You just won't flop big enough often enough to make this hand work 3 ways (probably not even 4). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
What happened to the theory you about entering a pot with a a raise with a raise or fold. You have no info on whats going on behind you and what first better may do. Its a fold to me and if you are going to play it reraise
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is a bad cold-call. You need to be very sure that you will get a multi-way pot. If you are wrong too often, it will cost you. [/ QUOTE ] I'm with Max. This guy raised UTG+1 and you don't know what's gonna happen preflop behind you, but there aren't many guys acting behind you. Ro |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
you have an 18% pfr to act behind you? he may be a fish, but don't let him help other people make money off of you. i just really hate cold calling and would muck this fairly frequently. for those who don't like this are the sentiments the same for KQs?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
[ QUOTE ]
Cool? [/ QUOTE ] Not so much. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
[ QUOTE ]
and if you are going to play it reraise [/ QUOTE ] I don't like reraising from this position. Because I really doubt our hand is going to play well HU with the orginal raiser. I also interpret the Original raisers aggression rating a little differently. I think a 1.4 type, probably is more likely to call down rather than fold. So I don't think we would have a whole lot of fold equity. Also there is a good chance that the LAG behind us will either call three cold or cap for fun, so we are right back in the same situation. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An Incredibly Mundane Question About Cold-Calling
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is a bad cold-call. You need to be very sure that you will get a multi-way pot. If you are wrong too often, it will cost you. [/ QUOTE ] This is so incredibly mundane, I'm just gonna say what this guy said. He's got a cigar so he probably knows what he's talking about. |
|
|