Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2004, 03:18 AM
Richard Berg Richard Berg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1
Default Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

Situation: cozy home cash game reaches out to acquaintances and friends-of-friends for some midsized tournament action. No single person knows everyone else anymore, but we assume nobody's invited a complete tool either.

Pokerwise, it's going to be a loose/passive paradise -- very intelligent people all around (Duke engineering grad students, mostly), but I'm certainly the only player to ever crack a poker book much less a forum. OTOH, soda is the strongest drink (recent string of birthdays hit the licquor cabinet hard); there's no reason to believe tempers/tilt will be a facto; nor is there a pervasive desire to gamb00l. Most people probably watch the WPT and, while inflating opinions of their own talent, do acknowledge the skilled nature of a deep-stacked NL game. Rebuys, turbo blinds, etc. wouldn't go over well.

We were very lenient about waiting for people to show up more or less at the appointed hour, but when the clock says the final guy is over 30min late and we're done counting out chips, it's time to start. Stacks start at 100xBB, level changes won't happen for 45min (fine with me, makes up for lethargic play), and all tables are 8-handed so no big deal.

Now the tricky part. A girl who only a couple people have ever met before is the first to go out after about an hour. I'm not sure who first proposed what, but we end up allowing her to take over the slightly-blinded chips from the apparent no-show in return for a 2nd entry fee. She eventually takes this stack well into the final table. Kosher?

I was certainly the biggest rules stickler all around, but this occasion didn't bother me much. What's your opinion? Note of possible importance: the "rebuy" moved her to another table.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2004, 03:47 PM
waciii waciii is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

I don't think she should've been allowed to take over. No one should get a benefit not available to others.

What would you have done if she'd busted out the guy's stack on a bad play as the guy was walking in the door?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2004, 05:44 PM
ohgeetee ohgeetee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 447
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

The guy had already paid his entry fee or you were just blinding him down thinking he would show?

If he already paid, to bad so sad for the chick who busted out early. thats not fair at all.

if he didn't pay yet, then it really is your call, and depends on what the tourney players think if you give them that chance. obviously, the results of what she accomplished with those chips after the decision is made should have no bearing on the decision itself, and if it causes bad blood amongst the other players, tough [censored] really, because they should have objected earlier.

frankly, with that crowd, id say give em the second chance, and any females you guys can get to stick around will only benefit you all 8P
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2004, 05:47 PM
mrjetguy mrjetguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 105
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

I would say no to letting someone takeover another persons stack. Simply because it's a freezout tournie and letting only one person have the chance to rebuy, even in a friendly game, souns like favoritism. And one HUGE problem in home games is allowing any sign of favoritism.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-06-2004, 06:17 PM
Richard Berg Richard Berg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

He had not paid. By the time the girl went out, we were pretty sure he wasn't going to show up; he never did. Thus prize/pizza money would've been affected, and perhaps more significantly, the table where he was being blinded away was getting another T1000 chips without paying for them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-06-2004, 07:30 PM
kona kona is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 37
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

I think the answer should be adamant no to the young lady. Unless you have a rule allowing rebuys then she busted out and that’s it. As far as you’re missing player, either you should have pulled his chips from the table and said he is out or keep track of the blinds and have him make them up if he shows up. You got yourself into this mess by taking the blinds and mingling the chips of someone who was not there and had not paid yet. That is I am assuming he had not paid because if he had you would have folded him till he was out of chips.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:06 AM
RiverTheNuts RiverTheNuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 203
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

Just ask yourself one simple question...

Was she hot??

If so, then while your play wasnt +EV, it might be +EP (expected play)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:12 AM
Richard Berg Richard Berg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

Yes.

(and FWIW I was not running the tourney, just observing an odd situation...one of many that night...)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2004, 07:42 PM
Mojo Tooth Mojo Tooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 129
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

I think you let the players give some voice. It needs to be more or less by unanimous vote, or at least by passive acclamation (if anybody has a problem with it, say so NOW).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-2004, 11:12 PM
LetsRock LetsRock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,495
Default Re: Tourney judgment call: taking over for an absent player?

I see no problem with that at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.