|
|
#21
11-03-2005, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!
The guy with KQ would have a dead Q and therefore it would not be a bad beat hand since you have to use both cards in the deck. Next time put (NC) in the post for no content
|
|
#22
11-03-2005, 05:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!
[ QUOTE ]
The guy with KQ would have a dead Q and therefore it would not be a bad beat hand since you have to use both cards in the deck. Next time put (NC) in the post for no content [/ QUOTE ] No. Next time don't post it.
|
|
#23
11-03-2005, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!
[ QUOTE ]
If the dealer had thrown that card at you and a little higher and faster she could've severed your neck veins and killed you and I would've never had to read this post. [/ QUOTE ] sweet
|
|
#24
11-03-2005, 05:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!
[ QUOTE ]
If the dealer had thrown that card at you and a little higher and faster she could've severed your neck veins and killed you and I would've never had to read this post. [/ QUOTE ] $hant, you are much cooler than shant.
|
|
#25
11-03-2005, 06:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Next time put (NC) in the post for no content [/ QUOTE ]No. Next time don't post it. [/ QUOTE ] Next time PM it to me. I thought it was interesting.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
