|
View Poll Results: A5s | |||
Auto-fold | 27 | 62.79% | |
3-bet only maniacs or people on tilt | 12 | 27.91% | |
3-bet LAGs or oportunistic blind stealers | 3 | 6.98% | |
Automatic 3-bet | 1 | 2.33% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
I never cold-call with any of these hands. Maybe that's why I'm so confused when another 'reasonable' player does it. I can possibly see it if you're fishing for a set with a mid/small pair and you expect 4+ players to take the flop, but Is there really a good reason to call with these suited K's and Q's? If you think you've got enough equity to play these against my range why aren't you 3-betting? You want to encourage the button and blinds to come along?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I never cold-call with any of these hands. Maybe that's why I'm so confused when another 'reasonable' player does it. I can possibly see it if you're fishing for a set with a mid/small pair and you expect 4+ players to take the flop, but Is there really a good reason to call with these suited K's and Q's? If you think you've got enough equity to play these against my range why aren't you 3-betting? You want to encourage the button and blinds to come along? [/ QUOTE ] Cold calling is a huge mistake that is often done by even "good" players. You should know this. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
Right. The poll asked posters in this forum to report which hands they would cold-call in the given situation. I'm not sure who responded to the poll, but apparently there are serveral players around here who think cold-calling QJs is a good idea. Anyone who responded to the poll care to denfend this idea?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OOP v. cold-calling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
Right. The poll asked posters in this forum to report which hands they would cold-call in the given situation. I'm not sure who responded to the poll, but apparently there are serveral players around here who think cold-calling QJs is a good idea. Anyone who responded to the poll care to denfend this idea? [/ QUOTE ] What about the people cold calling with KQs or AJs! You don't need them to defend their opinion, just label them wrong! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i see demons
I agree that checking the flop was a mistake, but I feel like I've lost all fold equity by now. I suspect I'm up against a pair, set or straight 1/3.75 times, so I am again reluctant to bet. The pot is tiny and the button is likely to check behind again, so it can't be a huge mistake to check again, can it?
And yes, my skirt is rather nice isn't it? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i see demons
[ QUOTE ]
I agree that checking the flop was a mistake, but I feel like I've lost all fold equity by now. I suspect I'm up against a pair, set or straight 1/3.75 times, so I am again reluctant to bet. The pot is tiny and the button is likely to check behind again, so it can't be a huge mistake to check again, can it? And yes, my skirt is rather nice isn't it? [/ QUOTE ] I don't get how you think your flop check was a mistake, but then you think that their range on the turn is what you say it is. How have their ranges changed? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i see demons
I would have been getting great odds on the flop, UTG could easily be holding a 6 or 8, and I now have one only card left to improve.
|
|
|