Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:21 AM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

While your reasons for not raising preflop are cogent, I don't like them at all.

1. The tard with AK: this is a pattern recognition thing. AK doesn't raise to 45 UTG+1 very often. That's a tentative raise, and most donks don't play AK tentatively. I see min-raises with it, and over-raises with it. But a less than pot-sized raise from AK there is not something that a great player, nor a poor player will do too often. I'd scratch that fear from your list. It's just not a common betting pattern, not by a longshot.

2. Knowing how to get away from ace-high flops is much different than planning to get away from an ace-high flop. An ace is coming on a random flop less than a fourth of the time, and it's much less than that if there's one or more out. So why plan so heavily on this situation and why convince yourself you'll fold before you define some hands? The key to playing an ace-high flop with an underpair is getting a read on the ace. You can do this with both preflop and post flop pot manipulation. You have a little more work to do here preflop, and a hell of a lot more work before you resign yourself to folding to an ace-high board.

3. C-bets come from players who have betting impetus. If you take betting impetus preflop, you almost eliminate the c-bet. So, just change the point in time where you charge your opponent for overplaying his ace: instead of sticking his c-bet up his ass, you can charge him preflop and let him just give up post flop.

4. There isn't any betting sequence possible that would allow somebody to still have chips on the flop and not believe their JJ/TT is good on a baby board. Have you ever seen how pretty JJ is?

So, your preflop call is highly sub-optimal here in my opinion. In fact, I would say that you turn this hand into a negative EV hand playing it this way... and if you are playing QQ for a loss, you are doing it wrong.

Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:36 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

[ QUOTE ]

Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take a shot. 120.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:38 AM
LesJ LesJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 144
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

<<Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.>>>

I believe I would raise this too. Here is where we are pre-flop again:
<<Preflop: Hero is MP2 with Q, Q.
UTG calls t15, UTG+1 raises to t45, 1 fold, MP1 calls t45, Hero ?????>>>>
The pot at this point is sitting at t130, with a couple of players already committed for t45 and still 5 more players to act after your play. I would think we would like to have maybe one caller at this point, but really no more. How does a raise up to t150 sound? Then I guess the next question would be what happens if the initial raiser or first caller of t45 decides to push? Abandon the queens, I assume?
Les
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:55 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

Man, I like calling with QQ sometimes as well but smarter people are saying its a mistake, so it probably is. ZeeJustin listed the benefits of calling with QQ in a thread, but maybe that was in relation to deeper stacks in a MTT and not applicable to sitngos.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:57 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

FWIW I think calling with QQ is fine here.

(Of course raising is perfectly fine too!)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:59 AM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 234
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

I was in the midst of writing a response, but Irie pretty much covered it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:02 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

Anything u say is worth a lot actually.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:13 AM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

What would you usually do?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:15 AM
maddog2030 maddog2030 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia Tech, $33s
Posts: 200
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

I'm just going to chime in and say that the Unarmed/Irie threads have consistently been some of the best on this forum lately.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:50 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $109s - QQ Hand

To raise or not to raise ... I will raise here 90% of the time (I like to vary my play which accounts for the other 10%).

I say the right amount is about 175. The worst thing you can do here IMO is make a wimpy raise that gets called in several places. One caller max is what I want here.

Interesting arguments for just calling though, Unarmed I love your posts, you always make me feel like I should be thinking more and surely that's a good thing. TY. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.