Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2004, 01:00 AM
DrGutshot DrGutshot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 131
Default another questionable valuebet or check behind

UTG is a HUGE moron, 76vpip 20pfr. SB is unknown.

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed)

Preflop: DrG is MP with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="CC3333">DrG raises</font>, CO folds, Button folds, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls.

Flop: (7 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG checks, <font color="CC3333">DrG bets</font>, SB calls, UTG calls.

Turn: (5 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG checks, <font color="CC3333">DrG bets</font>, SB calls, UTG calls.

River: (8 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG checks, DrG...?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2004, 02:22 AM
Scotch78 Scotch78 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

Seems like a clear check to me. Against just the moron I might bet hoping for a call from A-high, but against two opponents I don't see you getting called unless you're beat, and with no raises put in anywhere, I don't see a lone queen folding.

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2004, 02:25 AM
joker122 joker122 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 396
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

Even though UTG is terrible you still have to worry about SB. I check.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2004, 02:52 AM
stripsqueez stripsqueez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Adelaide , South Australia
Posts: 1,055
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

UTG is not a moron - he just likes to play

i was thinking bet - lower pairs and any A will probably call and no-ones done anything to suggest i'm beat - i might fold to a raise - i might not

stripsqueez - chickenhawk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2004, 03:06 AM
DrGutshot DrGutshot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 131
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

[ QUOTE ]
UTG is not a moron - he just likes to play


[/ QUOTE ]


words of wisdom...the "moron" was tilt-induced from him cracking overpair after overpair, then having my KK run into his AA only to be mocked by another player at the table. Of course I tried my best not to let this affect my play...

-DrG
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2004, 04:25 AM
TwoNiner TwoNiner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

I'd check it down, but I'm not as aggressive as most of the winning players here (and probably not as winning either). With as passive as the 5-10 is I think your as likely to see a call from a Queen as a pocket pair but I dunno. The flush getting there and all the calling should factor towards a check. Close, the more I write the more I think I'm wrong and you should bet, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2004, 04:51 AM
joker122 joker122 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 396
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

I don't understand how you could bet this. This is literally the worst river card possible. And low pairs? Unless it's 77-99 they aren't calling because the river just counterfitted them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2004, 05:03 AM
ShamaLamDingDong ShamaLamDingDong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

HOW CAN YOU CHECK HERE? What do they have that beats you? Maybe a flush thats afraid of a boat but then you don't even get check raised. The moron calls with any A and probably any K He doesn't have a pair Q or J thats for sure. Maybe he has a 6 and checkriases? Maybe but I want him to call with Ax Kx. SB isn't calling with a worse hand often but could have 77-99 maybe Ax gets a call, but Id expect him to fold most often and call when hes got a flush or 77-99.

SHAMA LAMA...DING DONG!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-27-2004, 07:01 AM
stripsqueez stripsqueez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Adelaide , South Australia
Posts: 1,055
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand how you could bet this

[/ QUOTE ]

i can bet this because i can imagine several feasible hands that will call and lose - i get paid by A high on the river a lot in these schools - it seems unlikely that either of these guys have a Q, J or 6 - the flush hitting is a bit scary but i still think its ok to value bet here

[ QUOTE ]
And low pairs? Unless it's 77-99 they aren't calling because the river just counterfitted them.

[/ QUOTE ]

forgot about that but still betting

stripsqueez - chickenhawk
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-27-2004, 07:47 AM
ShamaLamDingDong ShamaLamDingDong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Default Re: another questionable valuebet or check behind

STOP WORRYING ABOUT HOW BAD/GOOD THE OTHER PLAYERS AND HOW SCARED YOU ARE OF THE RIVER AND START TRYING TO PUT THEM ON HANDS. And not just the ones that beat you, ALL of the possible ones and try to make a rough guess of their likelyhood. After performing this it should be pretty clear a bet is in order.

SHAMA LAMA...DING DONG!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.