Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:36 AM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

[ QUOTE ]
"How to proclaim your poker school's train of thought is the greatest off the results of one tournament"?

dude, please post Masons hypocritical statement because it doesn't exist on this site..
you might want to work on your reading comprehension as you probably also missed a lot of what is in TOP...

[/ QUOTE ]

Doyle, Ivey, Chan: "nothing else needs to be said"

would'nt this constitute a results-oriented statement [example, bragging about someone's performance over top players in ONE tournament]? i'd like to hear what Mr. Malmuth was trying to convey when he said that, y'know, get a better understanding of things. GOD forbid it being taken the wrong way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:52 AM
That guy That guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calling down w/btm pair/no kckr
Posts: 399
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

"nothing else needs to be said"

ok fair enough - to each his own. my interpretation of that statement is a little different...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-07-2005, 02:16 AM
SoftcoreRevolt SoftcoreRevolt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 902
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

His friend and business partner had called him to inform him he had just beaten one of the top ranked players in the world, again achieving results for the third time after being criticized for never doing so.

The guy has the right to overreact and celebrate on his own forums. Now hopefully Fischman will get a Two Plus Two book deal on how to defeat Sklansky heads up, it is only fair.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2005, 02:25 AM
benfranklin benfranklin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

[ QUOTE ]

Should I be looking for the next 2+2 book, "How to proclaim your poker school's train of thought is the greatest off the results of one tournament"?

Lame.

[/ QUOTE ]

If not a book, how about just a little essay about giving your friend and partner props for a good job?

Petty resentment of someone else's day in the spotlight is truly lame.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-07-2005, 06:29 PM
AceFace AceFace is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

I agree. I don't see what the OP's problem was.

Let them cheer all they want. I wouldn't be surprised if Sklansky pulled off more wins like these if he put his mind to it. Looks like now he has a reason, called exposure.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-07-2005, 08:37 PM
Hold'me Hold'me is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: The sheer hypocrisy in Malmuth\'s post

I don't think Mason was showboating, he was just sharing his excitement over David's success with the 2+2 community. It does, however, seem that many top poker professionals show lots of contempt for 2+2 and their authors. They might just be frustrated with the fact that they can't make as much money as easily as before. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.