|
View Poll Results: Acting | |||
Aliens | 8 | 26.67% | |
Bladerunner | 22 | 73.33% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AA no reads
Third hand at the table, no reads at all. Comments on all streets please, thank you.
No-Limit Hold'em, $.25 BB (5 handed) converter MP ($19.10) Hero ($25.40) SB ($13.45) BB ($51.15) UTG ($22.10) Preflop: Hero is Button with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. UTG calls $0.25, MP calls $0.25, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $1.35</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls $1.10, UTG calls $1.10, MP calls $1.10. Flop: ($5.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $5.50</font>, BB folds, UTG folds, MP is all-in HERO ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
Raise a little more preflop. 3-4bb plus 1 for each limper is my standard. Flop bet is fine. I'm calling and if he has a set I'm reloading.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
So, it's a standard call here ? I was not sure
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
It's tough without a read because he could easily have a set (limp, call a less than 10% stack raise) and you're in bad shape.
Given that his stack is fairly small (ie approx 12 more into a 12 pot) you're getting great odds against just a flush draw which is a likely hodling. I often see sets c/r min not c/r all in, as they want a call more than the flush draw does. If you're both more like 200 BB stacks I think people would be more willing to lay this down. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
[ QUOTE ]
So, it's a standard call here ? I was not sure [/ QUOTE ] I think it's standard unless the stacks are extremely deep. Most of us make that call and lose our stacks no matter what we say on this forum. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So, it's a standard call here ? I was not sure [/ QUOTE ] I think it's standard unless the stacks are extremely deep. Most of us make that call and lose our stacks no matter what we say on this forum. [/ QUOTE ] I voted in favour of calling before hand. Agreed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
you gotta call. flush draw is way to likely to fold.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
fold.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
[ QUOTE ]
fold. [/ QUOTE ] Two-pair or a set? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no reads
Ok, so I would probably not fold this cuz I never fold aces basically, but if you are ever going to fold aces, now is the time. My thinking is that MP limped after multiple limpers so unless he's that rare guy who never ever raises PF we can rule out QQ or KK. Also if he's willing to play TT/JJ this hard on this flop he'd likely raise those too, so I just doubt we see those too often. 89 is also a very common hand. Then there is the fact that most people at this level never ever check raise, and the fact that it's so easy to have a pair + flush draw or a gut/oesd + flush draw on this board. We're really not in good shape.
|
|
|