|
|
#1
08-16-2005, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
He is so annoying, obnoxious and obviously doesn't understand the game of poker that well (at least he doesn't act like it).
Am I the only one who really thinks this guy needs to be yanked for someone else? The other guy, forget his name, is alright as a play by play. They need the guy from Cotter or Helmuth or something. Get rid of this donk! Agreed? 
|
|
#3
08-16-2005, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
[ QUOTE ]
Agreed? [/ QUOTE ] Hell no. His annoying chain of ex-wife jokes notwithstanding, he's fun to listen to. And he's absolutely right . . . the Ace of Spades is the prettiest card in the deck. Not that I'd cry if Gabe Kaplan took his place.
|
|
#4
08-16-2005, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
You don't watch the WSOP on ESPN in order to get in-depth analysis or interesting hands. You watch it for [censored] entertainment. He's entertaining.
|
|
#6
08-16-2005, 04:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
|
#7
08-16-2005, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
[ QUOTE ]
Norman Chad is a major reason (thought not the only reason) that the WSOP is as highly rated as it is. [/ QUOTE ] And your evidence for this is...?
|
|
#8
08-16-2005, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Norman Chad is a major reason (thought not the only reason) that the WSOP is as highly rated as it is. [/ QUOTE ] And your evidence for this is...? [/ QUOTE ] I don't agree necessarily, but if everyone found him as annoying as so many posters here do, it would clearly be rated lower.
|
|
#9
08-16-2005, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Norman Chad is a major reason (thought not the only reason) that the WSOP is as highly rated as it is. [/ QUOTE ] And your evidence for this is...? [/ QUOTE ] I don't agree necessarily, but if everyone found him as annoying as so many posters here do, it would clearly be rated lower. [/ QUOTE ] If the Super Bowl was broadcast only on the Disney Channel and the commentary was done by puppets, it would still get huge ratings.
|
|
#10
08-16-2005, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I really think Norman Chad is terrible for the WSOP.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Norman Chad is a major reason (thought not the only reason) that the WSOP is as highly rated as it is. [/ QUOTE ] And your evidence for this is...? [/ QUOTE ] I don't agree necessarily, but if everyone found him as annoying as so many posters here do, it would clearly be rated lower. [/ QUOTE ] If the Super Bowl was broadcast only on the Disney Channel and the commentary was done by puppets, it would still get huge ratings. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but if that had been the case from the outset, probably much less so.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
