#1
|
|||
|
|||
online poker legitimacy
A lot of the skeptic bashing by site proponents involves the desire to see proof of cheating by a site. How about proof they don't.
I'm not talking about reference to rng's, gaming commissions, or what the sites have at stake. I'm talking about the same proof expected from a person skeptical of putting their hard earned money into something they don't have faith in. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
What exactly would you consider proof? How would you go about proving this negative?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
[ QUOTE ]
I'm talking about the same proof expected from a person skeptical of putting their hard earned money into something they don't have faith in. [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand what this comment means |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
***** Hand History for Game 2133022400 *****
$1000 NL Hold'em - Tuesday, May 31, 04:08:40 EDT 2005 Table Table 37316 (Real Money) Seat 7 is the button Total number of players : 9 Seat 2: PeglegMcgee8 ( $1007.6 ) Seat 3: CYHAPMAN ( $2906.69 ) Seat 4: Viglev ( $2000.02 ) Seat 7: yesnaya ( $550.26 ) Seat 8: pmuir12 ( $1170.15 ) Seat 10: glowe_ ( $1100.56 ) Seat 6: SSR1210 ( $3570.55 ) Seat 5: uRdRznIPlay ( $590.1 ) Seat 1: snappo1 ( $1810.5 ) pmuir12 posts small blind [$5]. glowe_ posts big blind [$10]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to SSR1210 [ Ah Ac ] PeglegMcgee8 folds. CYHAPMAN calls [$10]. Viglev calls [$10]. uRdRznIPlay folds. SSR1210 raises [$120]. yesnaya folds. pmuir12 folds. glowe_ folds. CYHAPMAN calls [$120] Viglev folds ** Dealing Flop ** [ As, Ad, 2c ] CYHAPMAN checks. SSR1210 bets [$100]. CYHAPMAN raises [$500] SSR1210 raises [$3450.55] CYHAPMAN calls [$2786.69] ** Dealing Turn ** [ Ks ] ** Dealing River ** [ Qs ] CYHAPMAN shows [ Ts, Js ] a Royal Flush. SSR1210 shows [ Ah, Ac ] four of a kind aces. CYHAPMAN wins $5833.8 from the main pot with a royal flush. SSR1210 wins $663.86 from the side pot with four of a kind aces NOW HOW CAN I TAKE ONLINE POKER LEGITIMATELY AFTER THAT? RERAISE 2000 more with J high and no draw and hit runner runner royal on my quads. Somethign is real wrong there. I wanted to kill myself after that hand |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
Bad beat jackpot?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
I'm sure only for the house player (presumeably) that won that hand
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure only for the house player (presumeably) that won that hand [/ QUOTE ] please go away. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
Please quit defending these sites, obviously you have nothing better to do. Do you stay here all the time. I come back to make one post a few weeks later & your sitting right here waiting for me. JEEEZ
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
I haven't defended anything.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: online poker legitimacy
[ QUOTE ]
Please quit defending these sites, obviously you have nothing better to do. Do you stay here all the time. I come back to make one post a few weeks later & your sitting right here waiting for me. JEEEZ [/ QUOTE ] Yes, and we are watching you. |
|
|