Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-31-2005, 01:37 AM
jumpthru jumpthru is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 77
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

[ QUOTE ]
$2/$5 NL, villain and I both have around $500. Villain is solid but overaggressive, given to big bets, and also trapping->allin overbets with big hands.

So. I'm tilting a little and limp 22 UTG+1. Villain makes it $25 from the CO, I call, headsup.

Flop:

A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I check, he checks.

Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

I bet $35, he calls. Hopefully he is "trapping" with AK.

River: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I check, he goes all-in, I turbomuck, he flashes KK.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can someone please explain why this is such an obvoius turbomuck? Its an obvious turbocall for me, but I obviously suck.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-31-2005, 01:50 AM
Kaz The Original Kaz The Original is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

"Villain is solid but overaggressive, given to big bets, and also trapping->allin overbets with big hands. "

Always the read. Plus the only hand you were beating that is trapping is AK, which now beats you.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-31-2005, 05:08 AM
jpg7n16 jpg7n16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Land Up Over
Posts: 160
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please explain why this is such an obvoius turbomuck? Its an obvious turbocall for me, but I obviously suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

The OP knew the player to be on either AA, KK, or AK. When the A came on the river, any of those hands would give the "villian" the higher boat. Aces full of kings or kings full of aces... either beats 2's full of aces.

When you know that you are beat, turbomuck is a great option.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-31-2005, 05:45 AM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 81
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

I dont mind the limp in these games, but I also almost never will call a full raise, heads up out of position with low pair.

That being said, you get the flop you want, BET INTO HIM.
Almost everytime, you believe you're ahead here, BET.

With this particular player, he'll have slick, get excited that he doesnt have to hurt his brain figuring how to most trickily trap, and he will be ready to get it on.

The mistake was yours in the this hand, and it saved you a buyin.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-31-2005, 06:14 AM
freemoney freemoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: smooth-calling with aces
Posts: 889
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

yeah when i first read the post i thought it was in reference to his own play, i dont get his line at all
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-31-2005, 07:07 AM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

[ QUOTE ]
yeah when i first read the post i thought it was in reference to his own play, i dont get his line at all

[/ QUOTE ]

The gentleman likes to bet large, my line was to let him do so. I figured even if I checked I would end up allin with no trouble if he had AK/AQ. Stacks are not superdeep.

It's also possible he's got something that does not connect with the board, so leading out would fold him or make less than letting him fire.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-31-2005, 09:02 AM
kagame kagame is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lawrence, ks
Posts: 300
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

by bet large, do you mean reraise large?

or do you mean reraise a check raise large?

that would be the strongest play in poker if im not mistaken, and you want to make him be that strong when you have bottom set...ok

or were you planning on check calling till AK got there?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-31-2005, 09:56 AM
rwanger rwanger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

If you believe that he will bet big with a hand that did not hit this flop, then you should check it to him. If you believe he hit top pair, or top two...you should bet into him, because he is an aggressive player, and will raise you, committing himself to the pot. Specifically, if you put him on AK, HE IS NOT LAYING IT DOWN no matter what you do.

Let's say you knew he had TT, JJ, QQ? How do you get the most out of it? What about leading the flop, he very well may call, thinking that you're testing him becuase you wouldn't lead out with bottom set. Then you check to him on the turn, giving him a chance to bet because he thinks you were trying to take the pot on the flop.

If he has JJ QQ, he'll bet the flop if you check, then check behind on the turn because there are no realistic draws on the board.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-31-2005, 12:03 PM
LetYouDown LetYouDown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sharing a smoke w/negativity
Posts: 524
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

Sounds like your read/flop is essentially the same as mine in the hand/thread below (lower limit, but same concept). I put villain on AK and was able to get away fairly cheaply.

Flopped Boat

Some interesting analysis mixed in there, along with criticisms [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-31-2005, 03:15 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: nominee, worst play by a set

[ QUOTE ]
by bet large, do you mean reraise large?

or do you mean reraise a check raise large?

that would be the strongest play in poker if im not mistaken, and you want to make him be that strong when you have bottom set...ok

or were you planning on check calling till AK got there?

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's my plan:

1. Check/call the flop, because even if he does not have Ax beat, he is almost guaranteed to stab at the pot.

2. Lead out on the turn for the pot.

Plan was messed up by his flop check, now I'm stumped, so I lead out moderately. In the past this sort of play has elicited a big raise from him which is what I was hoping for.

My line is opponent-specific. He is a thinking opponent; he may well fold TT if I lead the flop. If I thought he were blindly aggressive leading the flop would be superior, I agree.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.