|
|
#1
12-12-2005, 08:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Skill level in Supers compared to smaller buyins?
Won a seat into a Super today, just wondering if I'm going to be blown away by the skill level of the players. I typically play tournaments in the $20-$50 range so I don't expect it to be too overwhelming. Is there a large jump in skill in these?
|
|
#2
12-12-2005, 08:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Skill level in Supers compared to smaller buyins?
[ QUOTE ]
...just wondering if I'm going to be blown away by the skill level of the players... [/ QUOTE ] BAHAHAHAHAHAAA! Oh god, you're killin me. Yeah, they're still terrible. Just more aggressive. You won't get people limping quite as late and you won't get people allin with A6o preflop unless you're lucky.
|
|
#3
12-12-2005, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Skill level in Supers compared to smaller buyins?
I'm mostly a cash game player at the 2/4ish level, but have killed Pearl a few times at Paradise so I took a stab at my first super last Monday and came 35th. And I think I only sucked out once. The quality of the players was remarkably bad, not much better than Pearl (which is horrible). I'm going to play tonight. Lets run a post!
|
|
#5
12-12-2005, 09:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Skill level in Supers compared to smaller buyins?
This will be my fifth one tonight in the last two weeks. I have been remarkably lucky with satellites. Won my first one this morning (again) and am once again in on $24.
I would say overall the play quality is a bit higher, but you will still see some unbelievably bad play. Since the skill level is so varied, concentrate on gettings reads at your tables.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
