Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:00 PM
henrikrh henrikrh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 312
Default WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

If you bust out as the last person before hte money Harrah's buys you into next year's event for free ($0 profit, break-even expected value) If you cash just barely in the money you get 12.5k. I recently found out that gambling earnings in the US are taxed almost %40, therefore 12.5k is becomes less than break even.

If you have an extreme short-stack near the bubble and you can either check/fold and someone will likely bust before your big blind, or go all in and have a chance ot double and a chance to get a free entry next year. Could it be more +ev to go all in than to wait for the money?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:09 PM
jackblack73 jackblack73 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

[ QUOTE ]
If you bust out as the last person before hte money Harrah's buys you into next year's event for free ($0 profit, break-even expected value) If you cash just barely in the money you get 12.5k. I recently found out that gambling earnings in the US are taxed almost %40, therefore 12.5k is becomes less than break even.

If you have an extreme short-stack near the bubble and you can either check/fold and someone will likely bust before your big blind, or go all in and have a chance ot double and a chance to get a free entry next year. Could it be more +ev to go all in than to wait for the money?

[/ QUOTE ]
Gambling winnings aren't all taxed at near 40%. It's only 40% if you're in the that tax bracket. Furthermore, I'm guessing you'd be taxed on the $10,000 buy in from Harrah's also.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:21 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

[ QUOTE ]
Furthermore, I'm guessing you'd be taxed on the $10,000 buy in from Harrah's also.

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct. Anything you recieve, of value, is taxed at the "face" value. Even if you sold your entry fee for less than 10k, you'd be taxed on the 10k.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2005, 05:53 PM
sixtwo sixtwo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

what if you won the 12.5k but previously lost in the 5k tourney. do you still report 2.5k on your taxes even though you had lost 5k
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2005, 08:16 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

[ QUOTE ]
what if you won the 12.5k but previously lost in the 5k tourney. do you still report 2.5k on your taxes even though you had lost 5k

[/ QUOTE ]

Now you're in the area that's been already talked about - your income bracket, allowable deductions, etc. There's no blanket answer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2005, 05:30 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

I net my tournaments, both now as a pro, and years ago when I filed as an amateur. When I buy in for 10K and win 12.5K, I put down +2.5K on my books. As such, cashing would mean I win 2.5K, and pay taxes on it as income. Thus, I might end up with a net of anywhere from +1.3K to +2.3K, depending upon my other income, and the rate at which my total income is taxed.

If I bubbled, and was given a free entry to next year's event, I would put that down as a 10K loss, as I'm out of pocket 10K, and the item of value I was given has no value until the event takes place next year. If the entry is non-transferable, then I have no possession of it until they sign me up next year, so I think it is perfectly proper to treat it as valueless this year. Of course, next year, should I cash in the event, my entry fee would have to be considered $0. Thus, a 12.5K win would require me to pay taxes on 12.5K, not on just 2.5K.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2005, 09:54 PM
MichaelOar MichaelOar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

Isn't the seat "constructively" received in the year that you win it? Also, I am just about positive that you only have to pay taxes on the fair market value of the seat if you sell it, not the "face" value of the seat.

Damn, I'm not looking forward to my federal income tax exam in two weeks!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-03-2005, 10:02 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

[ QUOTE ]

Damn, I'm not looking forward to my federal income tax exam in two weeks!

Mike

[/ QUOTE ]No kidding
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2005, 10:43 PM
2+2 wannabe 2+2 wannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: getting pwned in challenge
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: WSOP: Bubbling better than a weak cash?

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't the seat "constructively" received in the year that you win it?

[/ QUOTE ]

using the "accrual method" of accounting, yes it is
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-04-2005, 03:03 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WSOP

How about if you qualified in a satellite? If it was something like a $39 on Stars, getting $7,500 after taxes would be a nice payout. Even a $1k satellite at the Rio would net you a $6,500 profit. I'd take the money in that case rather than the seat and risk getting nothing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.