#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
why is everyone so fascinated with 15k hand samples?
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
I think HolyBolty needs to move down in limits....
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
I think HolyBolty needs to move down in limits.... [/ QUOTE ] i did |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
As a high stakes mod [/ QUOTE ] lol you got me have fun in oot buddy! |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
I think HolyBolty needs to move down in limits.... [/ QUOTE ] NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
Congrats man! That is very impressive.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
why is everyone so fascinated with 15k hand samples? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Krishan |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
why is everyone so fascinated with 15k hand samples? [/ QUOTE ] Did you see how many digits are in their wins and losses? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
Actually Josh, I think the most fascinating thing to see, is how "little" the big winners have won in terms of big bets here. Only a couple come in at over 250 big bets at each limits, out of a quite big pool of players.
I mean, during a two-month course, a few from a pool this big are bound to run at least 200 big bets better than expection from a two month period. Those making these lists, are favourites to do so. They are also highly likely to have run good lately. I think the most interesting thing to gather from this list is how tough and tight it really is at the top limits. lars |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party High Stakes Winners and Losers (datamined)
[ QUOTE ]
I mean, during a two-month course, a few from a pool this big are bound to run at least 200 big bets better than expection from a two month period. [/ QUOTE ] The data was reported incorrectly. It's about 1 months worth of data. Krishan |
|
|