easy value bet on the end or check to induce bluff? 30 bellagio

[MNpoker]

[ QUOTE ]
check to induce a bluff?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get this part. It makes it sound like you are sure you have the hand won (which based on the title I'm guessing you did win)

If the Button has a flush draw he shouldn't be raising here. (Especially if he plays 'moderately well')
I wouldn't expect him to being playing any 4 here either (except 44).

The only thing that makes sense is an ace.
You should fold the flop. IMO

[jayheaps]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
check to induce a bluff?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get this part. It makes it sound like you are sure you have the hand won (which based on the title I'm guessing you did win)

If the Button has a flush draw he shouldn't be raising here. (Especially if he plays 'moderately well')
I wouldn't expect him to being playing any 4 here either (except 44).

The only thing that makes sense is an ace.
You should fold the flop. IMO

[/ QUOTE ]

Completely agree. That is why i put her on a pocket pair. problem is 1/2 of the likely pocket pairs she might have involve a set. Given the way the hand played out I was 99% that I was ahead on the turn.

[The Truth]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
check to induce a bluff?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get this part. It makes it sound like you are sure you have the hand won (which based on the title I'm guessing you did win)

If the Button has a flush draw he shouldn't be raising here. (Especially if he plays 'moderately well')
I wouldn't expect him to being playing any 4 here either (except 44).

The only thing that makes sense is an ace.
You should fold the flop. IMO

[/ QUOTE ]

Completely agree. That is why i put her on a pocket pair. problem is 1/2 of the likely pocket pairs she might have involve a set. Given the way the hand played out I was 99% that I was ahead on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you posted the hand with a gimmick account. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

blake