|
|
#21
03-01-2005, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
u are 100% right
I know for a fact that its a myth that SD is bigger at 10/20 6max then at 5/106max at Party Poker.
I have nearly excatly the same (0.2/100 lower at 10/20) 10/20 is more lagish so it feels swingier and its more $. Thats all there is to it. Well, okay, 10/20 is 100h/hour and 5/10 is 90h/hour, but that is not a lot. I play 400 hands/hour when I 4table, not many playing so many hands at full table? Or are u guys 6- 0r 8-tabling? 
|
|
#22
03-01-2005, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fact or Fiction?: 6-max is More \"Swingy\" than Full
[ QUOTE ]
the party 5-10 6max game is not very aggressive so swings are not that great. the 10-20 6max is more aggressive so swings are worse. [/ QUOTE ] I find the 5-10 6max games totally unbearable lately, I've had about 10 losing sessions in a row. I've played roughly 20,000 hands or so without making any money.
|
|
#23
03-01-2005, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fact or Fiction?: 6-max is More \"Swingy\" than Full
[ QUOTE ]
this is because your SD/1,000,000 hands will be much smaller than your SD/100 hands. in Lost's original post he was stipulating 100 hand sessions, merely because SD/100 is the commonly collected stat. [/ QUOTE ] The OP said that variance is greater because you see more hands implying that your SD increases with your amount of hands. He went on to say that your SD/100 is less than your SD/200.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
