How much would a good player's hourly rate be at $2-$4?

I've heard of the classic "one big bet per hour." Although I know people that make far more and far less than this amount.

How much per hour should an above average, tight player make at $2-$4 limit hold'em online?

I am just trying to gauge how much a good player is expected to make online. I'm sure it varies greatly. If anyone has put in hours at $3-$6, $4-$8, or $5-$10 limit hold'em, it would be greatly appreciated if you'd post your hourly rates too. Thank you.

[TomBrooks]

I've made $4.64/hr single tabling 2/4 for 51 hours.
I've made $80.16/hr single tabling 3/6, but I've only done it for 10 hours. I don't expect anything close to that rate to continue.


13thR2a1stP

9$/hr single table 3-6 at pacific.... and i stress PACIFIC... the worst players in the world congregate here lol

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
and i stress PACIFIC... the worst players in the world congregate here lol

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? Worse than Party? I always thought Party had the best low limit games around but I haven't played elsewhere.

rvg

[livinitup0]

I dont understand how any site can be any fishier than others unless they limit their games quite a bit and make micro players play 1/2 and 2/4. Kinda like how truepoker and the crypto's used to be.

Plus these numbers are pretty low to me. a 4 tabling 2bb/100 at full ring can make theoretically 10 bucks an hour, 6 max and less is more like $20. But it seems OP's question is results oriented. you can figure these numbers on an average...but no poker player here or anywhere makes even close to an equal amount an hourly basis.

[Klompy]

shouldn't this be more like 17 dollars/hour for a four tabling 2/100 player full ring....or am i the idiot here

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
I dont understand how any site can be any fishier than others unless they limit their games quite a bit and make micro players play 1/2 and 2/4.

[/ QUOTE ]

In the case of Party I would suspect that it is because of their aggressive advertising. Ask any poker beginner what poker site they know heard of and most would say Party.

rvg

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
I dont understand how any site can be any fishier than others unless they limit their games quite a bit and make micro players play 1/2 and 2/4. Kinda like how truepoker and the crypto's used to be.


[/ QUOTE ]

As a bonus chaser, I play just about all the networks and there are very, very noticeable differences in game types. My pokertracker stats confirm this. For instance, the saw flop % on 2/4 games this month at pokerroom is 24%. (This is over 10k hands looking for the best tables at peak times.) Absolute full ring is even worse. Do you see that on party, Paradise, Pacific?

That damn split brought more games to the other sites, but many, many more disgruntled multi-tablers play.

[soko]

[ QUOTE ]
I dont understand how any site can be any fishier than others unless they limit their games quite a bit and make micro players play 1/2 and 2/4. Kinda like how truepoker and the crypto's used to be.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pacific gets most of their advertising from casinos, if you play 3-6 in a real casino and suck, then go home and stake yourself online, and you're a fish who doesnt care about money, you gonna play at the casnio limits or the wimpy $.5-$1?

[BoxLiquid]

[ QUOTE ]
9$/hr single table 3-6 at pacific.... and i stress PACIFIC... the worst players in the world congregate here lol

[/ QUOTE ]

It's true. Pacific is a money mountain. The players are drunken maniacs and it's almost scary what they do. Too bad you can only play one table at a time there.