|
|
#11
09-13-2005, 01:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To aggressive with A/K
[ QUOTE ]
You're actually getting 5.5:1 effective odds to call down. Even if you're not drawing dead on the turn, you don't have your full 5 outs. [/ QUOTE ] But shouldn't we take into account the possibility he has two pair, in which case we have 8 outs to beat/counterfeit him? I don't think we can be so certain he has the set. 
|
|
#12
09-13-2005, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To aggressive with A/K
In my opinion this hand should've gone:
Flop: SB bets, Hero raises, Button three-bets, SB calls, Hero calls. Turn: SB checks, Hero bets, Button raises, SB folds, Hero folds.
|
|
#13
09-13-2005, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To aggressive with A/K
You think the villain has T3? If we're lucky he has A3, and if we're unlucky he has AT. Against AT we only have 3 outs. let's calculate your weighted average of outs (against TT and 33 we're drawing dead):
[(6x9)+(6x3)+(3x0)+(3x0)]/(6+6+3+3)= approximately 4 outs. We'd really have to throw in a raise when we spike a K, a T or an 8 to make this draw profitable, but then we're getting 3-bet those times that we're behind on the river. So even if we 'improve,' we make one extra when ahead, and we lose 2 extra on the river when behind. We can lay down TPTK against passive opponents where appropriate. This is one of those times.
|
|
#16
09-13-2005, 06:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To aggressive with A/K
You're flop call is super-bad. Not in the James Brown good sort of way but in the worse than regularly bad sort of way.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
