|
|
#32
10-25-2005, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hand v xorbie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Against a tight re-raiser I am 3-betting AA almost all of the time [/ QUOTE ] im not a tight reraiser. paul [/ QUOTE ] You should be. 
|
|
#34
10-25-2005, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand v xorbie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You should be. [/ QUOTE ] against xorbie opening from the co... [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] paul [/ QUOTE ] Fair point. But I actually think it is even more imperative to re-raise in this case since you will have a wider hand. Against a tight re-raiser I will 3-bet often because they have a tight range and it is strong and they aren't likely to fold it (even though they should at times). But it is okay to call to trap because you have a decent sense of their range. But against a looser raiser, I think you MUST 3-bet because otherwise when the flop comes 567 you could easily lose your stack to a trickily re-raised 55. Whereas against the tight re-raiser you know you are ahead.
|
|
#35
10-25-2005, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand v xorbie
I don't 3-bet often, and I think it would sort of suck in this situation. My hand is super well concealed, if flop comes all unders I am taking his stack, I like that. I really don't think I can find a hand in my databse where I 3-bet against anyone but a total donk, or if I've been playing uber maniac. People just aren't that willing to burn money post flop.
|
|
#36
10-25-2005, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand v xorbie
[ QUOTE ]
People just aren't that willing to burn money post flop. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe you didn't see my two hands at the same time on different tables? If you're not 3-betting AA/KK preflop you are losing money. People will burn PLENTY of money postflop ANYWAYS.
|
|
#37
10-25-2005, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand v xorbie
[ QUOTE ]
I check here and fold to a decent bet. xorbie or not. [/ QUOTE ] I suggested check fold and got crucified. Might want to read the whole thread before you line up for the next round.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
