|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which car? | |||
| ~2001 BMW 330Ci |
   
|
12 | 18.18% |
| 2005 Acura RSX Type S |
  
|
26 | 39.39% |
| 2005 Volvo S40 |
  
|
8 | 12.12% |
| 2006 Audi A3 |
  
|
20 | 30.30% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
11-17-2005, 09:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
You know what's good?
Satsuma mandarin oranges. They're in season only during november and december, at least here in the US. They are seedless tangerines, basically, and they are very good. Try them. 
|
|
#24
11-17-2005, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
You know, it really was one of the most interesting online poker is rigger threads I have seen in a while. How did it become a taco thread?
I don't agree with the OP that this is happening at PS, but its an interesting question as to whether some sites may someday feel incented to use their software to guarantee that the fish pass over the rake a few extra times. Pokerstars never, they have too much to lose. But what about the smaller sites, as the become economically desperate, as they near the point where they have to post some good short-term results in order to find a willing buyer for their site? One of these days a site is going to be exposed by evidence of "non-random" card patterns. I hope when that happens it doesn't chase a lot of people away. I do not understand why there isn't already an inspection/certification company or group out there to protect us and these sites against the impression of rigged cards.
|
|
#25
11-17-2005, 10:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
[ QUOTE ]
Taco and Burrito Poll! [/ QUOTE ] CHIPOTLE NO QUESTION!
|
|
#26
11-17-2005, 10:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
Did you notice that the previous poster had an avatar that says "Tilt" and the poster previous to him had a name that says "Tilt?"
That is so incredibly unlikely, that this forum is obviously rigged.
|
|
#27
11-17-2005, 11:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
Two points.
1. I believe all of the major poker sites deal a 100% fair game. 2. I do not blindly trust all online poker sites and am ever vigilant for shady business. I think sadly there are morons on both sides. OBviously the "omfg its rigged!!!11" crowd are stupid but there are also alot of blind faith & trust people who could possible fall victim to a scam. If large companies based in the US can pull shady crap (Enron, Worldcom, etc.) then certainly a shadowy online gambling company very well might. Oh, and wtf is up with emailing a complaint letter due to bad beats? No wonder customer service at poker sites is so bad. Imagine how many emails they get like this a day.
|
|
#29
11-17-2005, 11:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I like tacos. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mmmmm Taco Bell. [/ QUOTE ] well - Taco Bell is actually shidt - but I cant stay away from them either. At least its better than crappy McD! [/ QUOTE ] But I would rather own MCD stock atm
|
|
#30
11-17-2005, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
[ QUOTE ]
You know, it really was one of the most interesting online poker is rigger threads I have seen in a while. How did it become a taco thread? [/ QUOTE ] sniff. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
