Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2003, 10:59 PM
Swiss Cheese Swiss Cheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: far far away
Posts: 128
Default Weak or correct cautious?

I am in the small Blind with A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 20-40 harrahs in East Chicago. folded to MP, any 2 card player, who limps, solid aggressive player raises, button calls, I just call, BB calls and limper calls. 5 players to the flop.

Flop 3-K-Q no 2 flush. I check and it is checked all the way around. OK where is the trap?

Turn is 10 no flush possible. I am not real fond of this card either. I check knowing original limper will bet if he has any part of the flop the original raiser grabs a bunch of chips and calls. I know this could be a play, or he could of raised with AJ after 1 limper pre-flop, and now he is gonna just call to get some other calls behind him. Button folds and I call, BB folds.

River is a total blank I check MP limper bets, original raiser just calls I just call.

Did I play this too weak or cautious correct?


Swiss Cheese

P.S. My hand was good limper had a Q and original raiser mucked before I showed my hand.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2003, 11:15 PM
Kevin J Kevin J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 648
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

It's hard to believe optimal play could involve checking top pair 3 consecutive times against multiple opponents.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2003, 11:35 PM
Swiss Cheese Swiss Cheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: far far away
Posts: 128
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

I was looking for the check raise on flop.....foiled. Turn is a 10 a scary board for 1 pair. River I think a bet or a check raise was the play but I think the most I get is 1 more bet. Is my thinking flawed?

Swiss Cheese
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2003, 11:38 PM
jujujaja34 jujujaja34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 62
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

Swiss,

I like 3-betting from the SB preflop in this situation. I'd like to get the BB and limper to fold here and play 3 handed. Also, 3-betting lets you take control (granted you are out of position, but with AKs I'm not too concerned) with likely the best hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2003, 12:20 AM
SoBeDude SoBeDude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,425
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

Hi Swiss.

Unfortunately you played it very weakly. You should bet out on the flop and re-raise if raised back to you, or you can go for the check-raise. If you do check the flop and it's checked through, you MUST bet the turn.

And the T is not a real scare card. It puts you behind only to KT, QT, and AT.

Good luck!

-Scott
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2003, 02:20 AM
elysium elysium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,891
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

hi swiss
you should reraise pre-flop and bet out on the flop. you want the raiser to raise you on the flop. and you three bet pre-flop because of your poor position. you need to get the bets in there right away. you can't fool around from the SB.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2003, 05:13 AM
Ed S. Ed S. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 199
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

Hey what about re-raising in this game? How do the percieve you? Anyways now and then with that hand and the way it came down on pre-flop its good to raise. But not necessarily all the time.

Oh btw, how are the 10-20 HE games going there? I haven't played there a while. Hows the tables? Tight? Loose? passive? Last time I played there it seemed at bit tight and passive at times.

Thanks.


Ed S.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2003, 06:01 AM
arod4276 arod4276 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 140
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

Elysium has it right. Reraise preflop and pound the hell out of them postflop from the SB.

arod
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2003, 08:48 AM
Kevin J Kevin J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 648
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

Hey Swiss-

Sorry. I had no time last night and just shot off a quick (attempted humorous) response.

AKs is a big hand that plays well both short-handed and multi-way. I think sometimes 3-betting pre-flop is fine, but not mandatory as some are implying.

After smooth calling pre-flop, it might seem like check/raising (the flop) would be automatic, but did you at least consider betting out? This pressures the two players between you and the pre-flop raiser while at the same time, possibly forcing others to call two cold on a drawing board. It's tough.

I see your point on the turn and river. It was a tough hand to play and I think you did fine.

I've been playing almost exclusively at Harrah's lately. I must be running good to have avoided you on the one day I didn't play.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-25-2003, 08:55 AM
Kevin J Kevin J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 648
Default Re: Weak or correct cautious?

[ QUOTE ]
And the T is not a real scare card. It puts you behind only to KT, QT, and AT.

[/ QUOTE ]

What about AJ and J9s? You are also assuming no one else was check/raising the flop (and missed) with a better hand than one pair.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.