How much does the increased rake at party effect us?

[DavidC]

[ QUOTE ]
There are two almost insurmountable problems with this. First, if the table is full, you get picked up after I think 28 hands. Two, you would need a buddy system since you can't sit at the same table if two accounts have signed in from the same computer.

WiteKnite

[/ QUOTE ]

Now worries... we pick a day and a time, and then everyone just finds a table with no one sitting out, and sits on it, until they're kicked off: repeat.

Obviously, don't boycott a table that you're playing.

[baronzeus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
brad,

I was just using partygirlUK's numbers. Her database said that

[/ QUOTE ]

PartygirlUK is a dude.

[/ QUOTE ]


I found out when he told me [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. WEIRD! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[imported_azalin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There are two almost insurmountable problems with this. First, if the table is full, you get picked up after I think 28 hands. Two, you would need a buddy system since you can't sit at the same table if two accounts have signed in from the same computer.


WiteKnite

[/ QUOTE ]

Now worries... we pick a day and a time, and then everyone just finds a table with no one sitting out, and sits on it, until they're kicked off: repeat.

Obviously, don't boycott a table that you're playing.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am in :P Anyone else?

[Poker Cat]

[ QUOTE ]
.13BB/100 is .09BB/100 after rakeback. Really not much at all if you're right.

[/ QUOTE ]

4-tabling, my rake has increased from $76/hr to $95, 25%. That's around $5/hr more in rakeback, but a net loss of $11/hr.

That's $22,000 a year difference.
About what a lifeguard makes.

[cartman]

Hi PokerCat,

Do you know what this translates to in BB/100? In other words, how many hands do you play per hour?

Thanks,
Cartman

[Poker Cat]

[ QUOTE ]
If you are at a table with less people, you are screwed.

WiteKnite

[/ QUOTE ]

<a href="http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/amount.html"
target="_blank">less/fewer</a>

Somebody help me with damn html <arrrrrf%$^&#%L:>

[Poker Cat]

[ QUOTE ]
Do you know what this translates to in BB/100? In other words, how many hands do you play per hour?

[/ QUOTE ]

I avg 3.65 tables, 350 hph.

The last 42,000 hands I've won 2.83 BB/100.
Now that I think about it, the figure I stated came from the PP rakeback formula, not actual rake. So the change to my rakeback is correctly stated at around $5/hr, but not sure what my actual rake change is. My VPIP is 30.5, slightly below average I'll guess, so it's probably not worse than my $11/hr estimate.

I played some 10/20 6max since 9/1, and to my surprise, the rakeback is only a few $1 higher. This leads my to believe that the _effective_ rake is now only slightly higher for 10/20 than 5/10. Looking at the player stats (several tables with 2 or more 60+), I think maybe it's time to move up.