Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Psychology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:26 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Loosing the first couple of hands...

Unless you've already established that 1k hands is your perfected length of session, then start playing with your session size a little bit. Try playing a single table 50-hand session. Then try a two-table 200-hand session. The fact is that you have to concentrate on every hand as if it your only hand of the session.

If you are habitually spending the first 200 hands of every session "getting used" to solid poker, then you are sacrificing EV on these hands. Instead, spend this time away from the tables putting your head into the correct playing mindset. Review some hands, browse 2+2, observe a table before you sit, etc.

On top of all this, you likely have a small sample size and selective memory regarding this issue. I've heard you can download a program called tilt-blocker that prevents you from seeing your stack size at the table. Another option is to always buy in for random amounts, making it harder for you to recognize whether you are up or down, or to continue adding chips to the table until you are no longer sure of how much you are up or down.

My "standard" buy-in at 1-2 is $60, but sometimes I'll buy in for $42, or $67, or $80. Sometimes when I drop below $60, I'll top off with another $32. This seems to work for me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:44 PM
ZenMusician ZenMusician is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Are the Queens called Quoons?
Posts: 77
Default Re: lOsing the first couple of hands...

[ QUOTE ]
I meant <font color="red">loosing</font> in the 200-300 first hands. not loosing 200-300 hands totally

[/ QUOTE ]

You have proven that this is not a typo and that you are indeed retarded.

Analyze the psychology of that.

Merry Christmas!

-ZEN
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:32 PM
xxx xxx is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 29
Default Re: Loosing the first couple of hands...

[ QUOTE ]
This is somewhat similar to my pattern. I begin slow and lose, in the middle I also lose some, but at the end I usually finish with a big flurry of losing.

[/ QUOTE ]

At least you have found a low variance style. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-21-2005, 06:45 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Loosing the first couple of hands...

Thanks for the reply. I will try a few of your suggestions instead of reading 2+2 after a session which I usually do and getting used to the table before I actually sit down. I will have to play a few thousands of hands using this and I will report back if it works.

Zen: WTF?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-21-2005, 07:01 AM
Pog0 Pog0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: lOsing the first couple of hands...

[ QUOTE ]
You have proven that this is not a typo and that you are indeed retarded.

Analyze the psychology of that.

Merry Christmas!

-ZEN

[/ QUOTE ]

It's probably just the avatar, but I really like this guy!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.