SNGs - other sites

[Scuba Chuck]

I'm tired of pounding away at Party. I recently tried some games at Bodog, and realized that my skills are far more rewarded in a different structure. Anyway, here's my question: Besides, Party and Pokerstars, where do you like to play SNGs?

Things to consider:
How quickly do tables fill?
Table limits?
Does the vig count toward rakeback?
Number of tables you can play?

[KJ o]

I like the turbos at Bodog. The rake is lower and the structure is exceedingly fast.

However, they don't fill up as quickly as I would like and none of the criteria you looked for are really there.

I just thought that other people who play low-limit SnG's like I do (as a math game, not as a poker game), would be interested in checking them out.

[Scuba Chuck]

To be frank. I really don't mind Bodog. Furthermore, the $35+3 6 man turbos at Bodog fill pretty fast.

Does anyone have any opinion about the SNGs on the crypto sites or prima sites?

I guess UB starts to become interesting with this new Pokershare site....

[amulet]

fulltilt's structure gives you the most play. they do not fill as quickly as pp, but that is offset by the amount of play they allow. additionally, since the site is growing so quickly, they are filling quicker and quicker.

[Drewboy22]

Don't laugh...but I have recently forund Pacific's SNGs to be quite profitable. Yes it sucks that you can only play one at a time, and yes the software sucks, but the competition is so god awful that it makes up for it. The levels are 10 min. which gives a little time to play. I really like the 2-table $30 + $3 that pays top 3 with $300 for 1st.

[Scuba Chuck]

Any reviews on pokerchamps?

From this link it states "Best SNGs..."

[wonderwes]

UB by far has the best SNG structure. 6 seat, 10 seat, headsup, and now 20/30/40 seater SNGs.

Not to mention their chip amount: 1,500 and blind levels every 10 min is what make it so efficient. Not to mention the software is just faster than party.