Nano Limits and win rates.

Hi all,

I just checked the FAQ for this forum and found information on winrates for .5/1 and 1/2 but was wondering what to consider good and unsustainable at the .05/.10 and .10/.20 limits. Right now I am at a win rate I consider unsustainable but have no idea what is realistic and "good" at the .05/.10 limits.

Thanks
Dave

[numeri]

I would consider a winrate of 513 BB/100 fairly unsustainable. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

I had ~8 BB/100 on Stars - no rake. Basically double the standard at 0.5/1 because of the lack of rake, and then bump it up 1 or 2 BB/100 because of the extra crappy play.

I would imagine that you want be around 4-5BB/100. A winrate higher than 9BB/100 I would imagine to be harder

[Eeegah]

I think if you're stuck playing .05/.10 or .10/.20 long enough for your winrate to converge to a meaningful figure then poker probably isn't your game.

I had a winrate of 7.82 BB/100 @ nickel-dime over 20k hands (and getting raked). At .10/.20, I had a winrate of 4.29 BB/100 over 8.2k hands.

And, yes, it felt like forever that I played those limits.