|
|
#51
10-03-2005, 02:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: October bonuses on Multi...
[ QUOTE ]
I cashed in and out multiple times with no problems. [/ QUOTE ] Can anyone confirm this. I don't really want to deposit $1500 there, but of course I want them all. 
|
|
#52
10-03-2005, 02:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: October bonuses on Multi...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just got this reply from Multi "A raked hand is any hand in which a rake (house drop) is taken out of the pot. To accumulate raked hands, just participate in hands (any game, any limit) where a rake is taken. There is no rake taken in tournament hands, hence you cannot obtain raked hands through tournaments." [/ QUOTE ] I do not believe this answer from Multi is true. I played 1755 hands of NL25 today. PT shows that 1340 were raked, but Multi shows 1263 hands raked. According to PT: 415 hands were not raked 312 hands were raked for $.05 1028 were raked for $.10 or more There is a discrepency of 77 hands between PT and Multi, but 312 hands in PT that were raked less than $.10. Maybe Multi is giving partial credit for ahnds raked less than $.10. [/ QUOTE ] Your portion of the rake has to be greater than or equal to .01. So at NL 6max or full ring, hands that involve more than 5 players would need to have pots >$2 (thus >.10 rake) to be counted towards the bonus. Party skins don't do partial credit. No 1/3, 1/2 nonsense. It qualifies or it doesn't. Hence the discrepancy. All of this info is somewhere on Party's site. I guess I should have mentioned this in my previous post.
|
|
#53
10-03-2005, 06:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question for you guys
thank you... someone who actually understands that it is never correct to not take a bonus because of rakeback. it always bothers me when people cite rakeback as a reason to not take a bonus. it is possible to be incorrect to not take a bonus for other reasons, but rakeback can never be one of them. i was going to take the time to post why, but you've already done so. good work.
|
|
#54
10-03-2005, 08:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: October bonuses on Multi...
[ QUOTE ]
Your portion of the rake has to be greater than or equal to .01. [/ QUOTE ] This part makes sense. I played Full Ring Games, and understand about the less than 5 players part. That would explain why some of the $.05 hands were counted. Did not realize that there were that many hands played with less than 6 players.
|
|
#55
10-03-2005, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: October bonuses on Multi...
[ QUOTE ]
20X? You'd be better off working in a sweatshop in Sri Lanka. [/ QUOTE ] 20x bonus + 25% rakeback works out to approximately $25+/hr playing 3/6 6m. This is (well) above the poverty line in North America.
|
|
#57
10-03-2005, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: October bonuses on Multi...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 20x bonus + 25% rakeback works out to approximately $25+/hr playing 3/6 6m. [/ QUOTE ] Based on how many tables and what BB/100 would that be? Cheers. [/ QUOTE ] That's 4 tables and breakeven.
|
|
#58
10-04-2005, 09:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question for you guys
Yes, I finally see the light here. If you already have a RB account on Multi, then these bonuses are a great supplement to your normal income. If you have a RB account on another skin, but not on Multipoker, then they're not worth playing.
|
|
#60
10-04-2005, 10:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question for you guys
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I finally see the light here. If you already have a RB account on Multi, then these bonuses are a great supplement to your normal income. If you have a RB account on another skin, but not on Multipoker, then they're not worth playing. [/ QUOTE ] Or you could always go for the gold and play more than 4 tables
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
