|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The Last Boy Scout (5) or Action Jackson (12)? | |||
| The Last Boy Scout (5) |
   
|
79 | 86.81% |
| Action Jackson (12) |
  
|
12 | 13.19% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
10-16-2005, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
I bet, he raises. Threebet or call? I don't consider folding. [/ QUOTE ] I call. If you raised in early position and he 3-bet you then I would 3-bet the river against most opponents, because you would only be worried about 1 hand - AcKc. Since you raised in steal position, he can 3-bet with a lot of Axs/Kxs hands here, and since you will always get 4-bet when he has the flush, you have to be good more often than 50% to 3-bet. 
|
|
#22
10-16-2005, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You should not of capped the turn [/ QUOTE ] honestly how can you type this out? [/ QUOTE ] I would like to know what type of person can insult someone so easily, without giving an explaination supporting their opinion. [/ QUOTE ] you mean my opinion on this hand? i think it's so incredibly obvious that it's not worth elaborating upon.
|
|
#23
10-16-2005, 12:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You should not of capped the turn [/ QUOTE ] honestly how can you type this out? [/ QUOTE ] I would like to know what type of person can insult someone so easily, without giving an explaination supporting their opinion. [/ QUOTE ] you mean my opinion on this hand? i think it's so incredibly obvious that it's not worth elaborating upon. [/ QUOTE ] I think he just mis-understood your grammar correction.
|
|
#24
10-16-2005, 01:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
Well, he might have pocket aces, queens, or jacks, but he might fold those if you 3-bet. Since you opened in last position, he might have Ac-xc or Kc-Tc or even another K-T. I think I just call.
BTW, I assume you meant you considered folding but rejected the idea.
|
|
#25
10-16-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
and since you will always get 4-bet when he has the flush, you have to be good more often than 50% to 3-bet. [/ QUOTE ] I'd have to be good over 33.3% of the time with this logic. Interestingly enough, if for some odd reason my (potential) river 3-bet was a cap (i.e. 3 bets = cap), then I would probably have 3bet. But I just called. I guess that means I thought I was ahead less than 33% of the time, but more than 7%) Josh
|
|
#26
10-16-2005, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: and since you will always get 4-bet when he has the flush, you have to be good more often than 50% to 3-bet. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'd have to be good over 33.3% of the time with this logic. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe using Bizarro logic.
|
|
#28
10-16-2005, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
so you would have preferred he removed the word "of" from "You should not of capped the turn" to form the sentence "You should not capped the turn"?
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#29
10-16-2005, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
so you would have preferred he removed the word "of" from "You should not of capped the turn" to form the sentence "You should not capped the turn"? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#30
10-16-2005, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Go another bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so you would have preferred he removed the word "of" from "You should not of capped the turn" to form the sentence "You should not capped the turn"? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] lol. anyhow, "should not of" is improper english. "should not have" is the proper english, which is abbreviated in speech sometimes as "should not've", causing the confusing.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
