Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:46 AM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Default What I did.

[ QUOTE ]
Party 30-60.

All fold to me in SB, I raise w/ 88, BB calls.

Flop A24, two spades. Bet, raise, threebet, call.

Turn is 6h, putting two hearts out there, too.

Bet, raise, call.

River 8d. Checkraise or bet out?

Thanks,

Josh

[/ QUOTE ]

I checked.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-31-2005, 03:52 AM
Pog0 Pog0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Default Re: What I did.

[ QUOTE ]
I checked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Based on your analysis of your opponent's hand, your thinking is that he's on a busted draw and the only bet you're getting out of him on the river is from a bluff?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-31-2005, 07:22 AM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

wow i think check-calling after the guy raises the flop is okay. as for the river i think you should bet/reraise but that's only cause i think the guy has the A he's been representing, which apparently you didnt since you kept calling him down.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-31-2005, 11:51 AM
SA125 SA125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

[ QUOTE ]
The key to reading hands, and poker in general, is realizing it's not black and white. Everything is probabilities. Not just "the probability of flopping a set" probabilities, but "what is the chance he plays this hand that way" probabilities.

You don't want to get locked into "He must have XX" type of thinking. It's better to have a "He **could** have XX" thinking.

In my previous post, I talk about what he'd LIKELY do with any holdings, and I stand by those. I say that he likely wouldn't raise the flop and turn with an ace, for example.

If I get to showdown and realize he did precisely that, it doesn't mean that my assessment was incorrect. However, the next time that situation comes up, I should probably tweak my percentages (but not necessarily overhaul them altogether)

I hope that makes sense...

[/ QUOTE ]

It does, which is why I'm glad you're posting more.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:11 PM
SA125 SA125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

[ QUOTE ]
I hope it's not "out of respect for me", and I doubt it....I deserve brutal honesty....

But I think it's bad to fold the turn...okay, that's a lie. I think it's horrible to fold the turn.

There are quite simply way too many times I'm ahead. Seriously, what could I be behind?

A small ace almost never raises the flop AND turn. A big ace threebets preflop.

Flop raise is likely less than two pair, especially with the ace out there (if they flop two pair, and I have a hand like QJ, they really don't want me to fold, and i would). So, for some reason or another, two pair, big ace, and small ace are all unlikely on the flop.

A6 is definitely a possibility, but I still think they play it this way less than 50% of the time (the flop raise in particular). A hand like 64 is certainly possible, but if that's what they have, I have 8 outs to catch up, and I"m gettin 8:1.

Now, certainly, I CAN be behind. But the possibility just isn't that high (not over 75%, I don't think).

But there are tons of draws out there (Pair + Flush draw, Pair + Straight draw, naked flush draw, etc).

I just don't think I can fold the turn.

Josh

[/ QUOTE ]

Good reply and excellent analysis. I think you're behind on the turn more often than not. I don't know either if it's the 75% number you mentioned. I find it interesting you included that. Is that the number you like to believe you're behind enough when debating to fold? Or is it not relevant enough to pursue, because I find it interesting if it is.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-31-2005, 01:51 PM
eviljeff eviljeff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

he doesn't seem shy about raising your bets. seems like the only case where betting is not better is where he's been on a draw the whole way and won't bluff-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-31-2005, 01:53 PM
eviljeff eviljeff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

[ QUOTE ]
honestly, whenever i go for a checkraise, they check behind every time.

[/ QUOTE ]

heh, baronzeus is a c/r virgin
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:48 PM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Default Re: Blind war...river checkraise?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I hope it's not "out of respect for me", and I doubt it....I deserve brutal honesty....

But I think it's bad to fold the turn...okay, that's a lie. I think it's horrible to fold the turn.

There are quite simply way too many times I'm ahead. Seriously, what could I be behind?

A small ace almost never raises the flop AND turn. A big ace threebets preflop.

Flop raise is likely less than two pair, especially with the ace out there (if they flop two pair, and I have a hand like QJ, they really don't want me to fold, and i would). So, for some reason or another, two pair, big ace, and small ace are all unlikely on the flop.

A6 is definitely a possibility, but I still think they play it this way less than 50% of the time (the flop raise in particular). A hand like 64 is certainly possible, but if that's what they have, I have 8 outs to catch up, and I"m gettin 8:1.

Now, certainly, I CAN be behind. But the possibility just isn't that high (not over 75%, I don't think).

But there are tons of draws out there (Pair + Flush draw, Pair + Straight draw, naked flush draw, etc).

I just don't think I can fold the turn.

Josh

[/ QUOTE ]

Good reply and excellent analysis. I think you're behind on the turn more often than not. I don't know either if it's the 75% number you mentioned. I find it interesting you included that. Is that the number you like to believe you're behind enough when debating to fold? Or is it not relevant enough to pursue, because I find it interesting if it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

The 75% number was just something I threw out there as a rough estimate. If I call the turn raise, I almost have to call any river. When he raises the turn, there are 8 BB in the pot, and I'll lose 2 more bets (one more on turn, one on river). So, if he never bluffs the river (worst case scenario), I'm risking 2 to win 8. I guess I shoulda said 80% then. If I'm ahead more than 20% of the time, I should call down, even if he never bluffs the river.

If he'll bluff the river, I'm risking 2 to win 9, so I only need to be ahead 18.2% of the time.

The 75% was a quick estimate, and was off a little.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:51 PM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Default Re: What I did.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I checked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Based on your analysis of your opponent's hand, your thinking is that he's on a busted draw and the only bet you're getting out of him on the river is from a bluff?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think his most likely holdings are: A6, 46, or some sort of draw (maybe draw/pair combo).

If he has A6 or 46, he'll bet. If he has a busted draw, he may or may not bet, but there's certainly no value in me betting.

It's entirely possible I underestimated his chance of having A5 or A3 and he checks behind (IMO, those are really the only hands he can possibly play this way that checks the river).

I think it's close, but since I wake up every morning hoping I find a way to checkraise the river, I think checking is correct.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-31-2005, 04:53 PM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Default Results.

[ QUOTE ]
wow i think check-calling after the guy raises the flop is okay. as for the river i think you should bet/reraise but that's only cause i think the guy has the A he's been representing, which apparently you didnt since you kept calling him down.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't "keep calling him down", I only called once the entire hand. I ain't no pansy.

In reality, the guy had T4o, and he checked behind on the river.

I think that there is probably about a 50% chance he calls a river bet, and maybe a 10% chance that he bets the river. All this means is that if I was good enough to put him on this hand, I shoulda bet the river.

Josh
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.