|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)
Here's a question: how many tournaments played is considered a staistically significant sample size?
Since I became a winning player, I've been pulling a great ROI (I don't have stats before then), but I still don't know how much of it is just being on the good side of variance. (I'm getting close to 200 MTTs if my numbers are correct.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)
From what I've heard it's 200 MTT's per level that you play. Which is quite a lot of tournaments if you play a wide variety of MTT's.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)
Yeah... my direct buyins range from $11s to $215s (though not often). Plus a smattering of rebuys, usually $11rs but occasionally the $3rs and $5rs (and in one unfortunate incident last night, a $33r).
I just worry I'm headed for a hard crash (and I've been witnessing the cruel side of variance all week). What kind of ROI can a good player expect in MTTs, anyway? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about MTT ROI versus 1 table ROI (Mark Blade)
I had two final tables on Xmas night and since then I haven't been able to win to save my rear end. It's been horrible.
I don't really have a large sample size. Just bought poker tracker for this computer and only have 74 tournaments (total) on it as of now. Perhaps someone who has a large selection currently can tell you. I've heard (don't take this as gold) that a good ROI for MTT play is somewhere between 100-125%. But I'm not absolutly certain those were the numbers he gave me. Anyone else answer this question plz?! |
|
|