Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-25-2004, 04:48 PM
SpeakEasy SpeakEasy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 51
Default Re: Now David, I am angry!!!!

[ QUOTE ]
I think it's time you stopped berating players about the math. You are perhaps mathematically correct +/- a few % about the hands you may use for example, but it isn't the only answer!

[/ QUOTE ]

My father used to have a phrase that he would say to me from time to time, back when I was a teenager and was going through the “I’m smarter than my parents” phase:

“Your mind has slammed shut like a steel trap. You are not hearing what I’m saying because you don’t like the way I’m saying it.”

The same thing is happening here. Listen to David and you might learn something. Don’t get all wrapped up in how he says it. He may sound gruff and offend your sensibilities, but you might also learn something. Aside from the specific question that sparked this discussion, the message here is now very simple: learn the basics (math), then learn the advanced techniques (reading players). Any other way is losing poker.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-25-2004, 05:14 PM
DonkeyKong DonkeyKong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 274
Default Re: Now David, I am angry!!!!

Challenging professors are the best professors, they force you to back it up and that is the only way to really learn the fundies. He is demanding of the math and rightfully so... but this is clearly not 'all math' so we might not have to spend so much time on the math vs non-math argument if he was just a little more flexible in such statements...
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-25-2004, 10:17 PM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 241
Default Re: Now David, I am angry!!!!

The reason I said this particular problem was almost all math was because in this very specific scenario its pretty clearcut which hands you will and won't be called with. I may have assumed too much in thinking that was obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:19 AM
illguitar illguitar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mount PLaeasnt, MI
Posts: 78
Default Re: Now David, I am angry!!!!

Big fan of 2+2 publishing and new to the site. I love when David posts questions...but Dave, please give some answers to us common folk sometimes!!! lol That is all.

-Daver

PS- What are some good books or websites that can be found on poker math? I am new to poker and I honestly and truly never thought to calculate anything on your question. Though I see it clearly now. Do any of your books teach this kind of stuff? If not where can I learn to think like this and have practice problems. Very interested.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:50 AM
CrisBrown CrisBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,493
Default Re: Now David, I am angry!!!!

Hi illguitar,

For this type of problem, The Theory of Poker and, to a lesser extent, Tournament Poker for Advanced Players are probably your best resources in terms of the math angle. If you have a good foundation in probability mathematics, those should be adequate. If you don't have a good foundation in probability mathematics, you should get a good primer on the topic and study it.

Cris
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.