#1
|
|||
|
|||
First 20/40 post - badly played?
Live at Commerce, full-table, game is okay. I feel I played this hand horribly.
Folded to LP. He is a good player who has been keeping his stacks afloat by way of frequent blind steal attempts. Most of the players have obliged. He open-raises. Folded to me in BB with 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], I call. Headsup. FLOP: K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] I check. LP checks behind. TURN: rag I bet. LP thinks for a while and calls. RIVER: A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I check. LP checks behind. My hand is good and LP does not show. All comments welcomed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First 20/40 post - badly played?
played it fine.
all streets. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First 20/40 post - badly played?
Raiser is a good thinking player. For me to call his raise preflop (since I aspire to play as tight as Rick Nebiolo), he knows I have a semblance of a hand. With such a strong flop, I'm thinking that he's thinking I would go for the standard check-raise. Is a check-raise attempt still warranted? Or would a flop bet have been better?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First 20/40 post - badly played?
This pot is so small that it will probably stay small. Going for the flop c/r is ok, but after you bet the turn, you should bet the river for sure.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First 20/40 post - badly played?
checkraise is still better.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First 20/40 post - badly played?
we all miss check-raises. it's life. nh.
|
|
|