|
|
#11
10-12-2005, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On the subject of my bible-length posts
[ QUOTE ]
wrong [/ QUOTE ] I fold. 
|
|
#12
10-12-2005, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On the subject of my bible-length posts
[ QUOTE ]
Two comments: 1) You missed an important point: head each chapter with an appropriate quotation. 2) He can sell when he wants to. I refer you to The Best Titled Post of All Time [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'd forgotten about that post... I'm busy doing my research for the sequel ("Just in case you couldn't multiply by 500")
|
|
#13
10-12-2005, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On the subject of my bible-length posts
[ QUOTE ]
You write wonderful treatises, and have colourful language. You contribute enormously to the poker forum here and I have enjoyed your posts on many occasions. [/ QUOTE ] I hope you guys didn't notice me break out my gimmick account for this. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] Thank you very much, Adam. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] Jax, my sarcasm meter is going off the charts here. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] USDaniels, thanks for your input. It's valued.
|
|
#14
10-12-2005, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On the subject of my bible-length posts
David FWIW, I think that long posts are fine. I feel like those who type TL
 R or say that they stopped reading when they saw how long it was are cheating themselves. Not every poker concept can be broken down into six neat little sentences. Part of the chalenge of learning is the desire to dig deep into the information out there and glean nuggets of knowledge. Keep up the quality posts.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
