Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2005, 01:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default What would be correct (10/20 nl)

Regarding this hand:
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/1014

I didnt have the HH so I'm posting this link.

People were arguing that he didnt have pot odds to call, while I think that even though the call is an EV- one, folding there is even worse EV, so I'd rather call that.
Am I wrong in my thinking?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2005, 02:07 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: What would be correct (10/20 nl)

folding is, by definition, zero EV
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2005, 02:13 PM
JKratzer JKratzer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 65
Default Re: What would be correct (10/20 nl)

I think you're looking at this the wrong way. Folding loses $0, while calling the all-in with out correct pot odds costs money.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.