Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-24-2005, 02:18 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

Hi JR-

I don't have time to go through too individual hands right now; I've only got ~ 270 on you anyway. PT says you're a 19.85/15 ... seems like you could get that a bit higher. In my particular sample, your WTSD is pretty bad (26%) but I know that's not enough hands to be statistically valid.

Here's a hand to chew on:

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (6 max, 4 handed)

Preflop: Hero has A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
One fold, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, Hero calls.

Flop: (1.33 SB) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (1.66 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB 3-bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (7.66 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 9.66 BB

Standard?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-24-2005, 02:20 PM
imported_leader imported_leader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 510
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

[ QUOTE ]
leader hand 1 is confusing me a bit, you are hero right? why didn't you raise the flop or at least the turn?

oops I hijacked

[/ QUOTE ]

I mix it up. I think raising the flop against an TAG is a mistake. The turn could go either way, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-24-2005, 02:34 PM
jrbick jrbick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 129
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

Happy,

Thanks for taking the time.

Over-all I'm 22.07/15.65. WTSD is 34 over 85k.

I wouldn't call that hand standard. Really depends on villain. Don't know his stats or have his notes on hand. The way I played it I should probably fold to the three bet on the turn or just call down from the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-24-2005, 03:43 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

Yeah, I'm not sure if you thought I was running over you that time or not. Let's just say my KTs poked big holes in your AT [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-25-2005, 12:46 AM
KDawgCometh KDawgCometh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: spewin chips
Posts: 1,184
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

I don't feel like going into my DB right now, but remember playing you off hand. You were generally straight forward, and I was able to go after your blind a fair amount, as if you defended, you would be able to fold to either to flop or turn bets
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-25-2005, 11:37 AM
jrbick jrbick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 129
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

KDawg,

I appreciate the comments. I've basically been playing a fit or fold strat. when it comes to defending blinds. There are times where I figure I can fold someone out w/ air but I don't attempt plays like that very often. If I had strong UI SD hands they were usally played stronger preflop anyway.

As far as the straightfoward play, could you elaborate further? Would you say my play was predictable?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-25-2005, 12:32 PM
KDawgCometh KDawgCometh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: spewin chips
Posts: 1,184
Default Re: Thick Skin 101 - Review of old Party name appreciated

[ QUOTE ]
As far as the straightfoward play, could you elaborate further? Would you say my play was predictable?

Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]


it wasn't as much predictable as it was run-of-the-mill TAG stuff, ya know. Granted, I normally wasn't sitting at your table, and I wouldn't neccessarily stay at your table long(unless there were a couple of 40 VPIPers there), but, I wasn't always running when you would sit(depending on seat position of course). Basically, I wasn't ever too worried about you isoing me when I'd be trying to iso bad players, at the same time, I wasn't jumping for joy when you would sit at the table(which I would when lancasterus sits down). Basically, I knew when to move you off of hands in either three way pots(to get into a better situation with a donk) or in HU pots. I will add though, that I haven't seen you anywhere near a table of mine in almost a month at the least, so, things might've changed
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.