Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2005, 03:54 AM
Che Che is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Default weak-tight with QQ?

Second level of the Sunday night UB $215 multi just began. Blinds 10/20. Surprisingly few first level bustouts in this one so average is probably ~2700.

I rarely play multis here and have no relevant reads.

UTG limps (3090).
UTG+1 raises to 90 (2425).
Fold.
Call (4890).
Call (3050).
Fold.
CO calls (2545).
Fold.
I have Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] in the SB and call (2290).
BB folds.
UTG calls.

Flop: T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (Pot=560)

I check, UTG checks, UTG+1 bets the pot, fold, fold, CO minraises, I fold.

Thoughts?

Later,
Che
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2005, 04:09 AM
david050173 david050173 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 25
Default Re: weak-tight with QQ?

Other than a set what do you fear? With that many calls one would surprise me and since you chose to play your queens for set value a fold might be ok. I think I would have lead out with a bet and see what happens.

I think I would have raised preflop. My thought is UTG and UTG+1 might have aces or kings but the later hands would be reraising with them. I would rather find out preflop rather than postflop. It is likely that a couple of the aces and kings are out so the odds of an over card flopping are reduced and there are probably some small pairs that you dominate and don't want to let them see a cheap flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2005, 04:31 AM
pokerraja pokerraja is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: weak-tight with QQ?

i think this is extremely weak tight play. why not pop a big fat reraise preflop? thin the field, and see where u stand. i see no reason why not to think that u have the best hand here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2005, 05:27 AM
zaxx19 zaxx19 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not in Jaimaca sorry : <
Posts: 3,404
Default Re: weak-tight with QQ?

You simply have to reraise here preflop. I cant really tell if this is a play for deception or just weak passive. I understand that this is a deep stacked tourney and a decent buy in but you still hold the 3rd best hand in holdem...Protect it. JJ is a different story but the way some people overplay AQ nowadays you got to play QQ fairly strongly here IMHO/. Same story after the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:24 PM
Che Che is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Default RESULTS

Thanks for all the replies.

UTG folded, UTG+1 pushed, CO called.

UTG+1 had AA and did not catch his 2-outer against CO's TT.

I think my flop check-fold is good. I would have come over the top of UTG+1 if it had been folded back to me, but I didn't want to take on two players on a multiway flop.

PF call is certainly questionable. I decided to play for set value and the results justified my conservative play, but that doesn't make not raising correct.

I posted this to get non-results-oriented evaluations, and I appreciate those who responded.

Later,
Che
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:52 PM
Dawdy Dawdy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: RESULTS

I am suprised you got away from this hand so cheaply!
With hindsight thats a very good play buttt
Why didnt you reraise preflop to say 300? Was it the limp from UTG? Limping UTG is standard preflop play hoping for the raise behind.. which UTG+1 provided. Otherwise I cant see the value you will get from going multiway with a high made pair. Cutting down the drawers seems logical here as your getting 6/1 pot odds on a 7.5/1 draw.
Would the pocket T's call a reraise? Some do some dont. Your in a bad state vs the pocket rockets and infact you would have lost the pot to them at some point in the hand but without raising how would you get the info he had anything?
Obviously you made a great decision I just dont understand how you came to it. I wish I could minimise my losses on hands like these.

Dawdy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:10 PM
MLG MLG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cards Happen
Posts: 727
Default Re: RESULTS

i think not reraising preflop here is a mistake, but I'd like to be persuaded otherwise so have at it che.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:15 PM
Che Che is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Default Re: RESULTS

MLG-

[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to be persuaded otherwise so have at it che.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. I'll have to persuade myself first so you may have to wait a while. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

But, I do plan to mull over it a little more so let me ask you this before I get started: Do you raise JJ here?

Later,
Che
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:18 PM
MLG MLG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cards Happen
Posts: 727
Default Re: RESULTS

no, thats my cut off.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2005, 08:14 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: weak-tight with QQ?

I probably reraise PF, but after the minraise that flop *sucks* for you.

(Yes, sucks. UB is full of mountains and they only get steeper as you move up. At that buyin, he sure as hell didn't cold call and then minraise KT, which leaves you with a)exactly JJ minraising *and* AK behind you or b)2 outs.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.