|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 5 vs 12 | |||
| Neo |
   
|
83 | 69.75% |
| Papa Smurf |
  
|
36 | 30.25% |
| Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
05-05-2005, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin
[ QUOTE ]
Beatles and it's not even close. What kind of a poll is this? Christ. [/ QUOTE ] It's the type where you either click the button next to one of the contestants or the other. No wonder your roomate is getting to play strip mario kart with hot girls while you have to use your sex chair [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] 
|
|
#14
05-05-2005, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It's a tough one, since they're my two favorite bands, but I had to go with Zeppelin for their superior musical ability. [/ QUOTE ] Other than Bonzo clearly being better on the drums than Ringo, I don't see how any Zeppelin member is better than any Beatle member in musical ability. George > Jimmy (guitar) Paul > John Paul (bass) John > Robert (vocals) Don't even get started on songwriting ability. This one should be a slam dunk for the Beatles. [/ QUOTE ] You're kidding right? George was a run of the mill guitarist, and Jimmy was one of the greatest. John Paul Jones was a much better bassist and pianist than McCartney(sp?). Robert Plant was a more talented vocalist by far. You might actually have somewhat of an argument if you include the small period where Eric Clapton played with the Beatles. The Beatles do have the edge in songwriting. [/ QUOTE ] John Paul Jones was not a better bassist than McCartney. Not even close. McCartney was a much, much better musician in general as well. Plant vs. Lennon is close but that's JMO. They aren't really comparable as the music is so different.
|
|
#17
05-05-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin
[ QUOTE ]
John Paul Jones was not a better bassist than McCartney. Not even close. McCartney was a much, much better musician in general as well. Plant vs. Lennon is close but that's JMO. They aren't really comparable as the music is so different. [/ QUOTE ] I can agree with you about JPJ vs. McCartney being close. Plant vs. Lennon is close simply because Lennon has a more enjoyable voice IMO. However, when it comes to vocal range and such, Plant is more talented.
|
|
#18
05-05-2005, 09:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin
[ QUOTE ]
Zepplin's a glorified hair band. Beatles are classic. Easy choice. [/ QUOTE ] *** You are now ignoring this user. You will no longer see the body of any of their posts. ***
|
|
#20
05-05-2005, 09:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Beatles and it's not even close. What kind of a poll is this? Christ. [/ QUOTE ] An OPINION poll. [/ QUOTE ] How can it be an opinion poll if there is one correct answer? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
