Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?

grandgnu · #1 03-13-2005, 06:32 PM

No offense is meant (well, not too much offense) but this website seems poorly designed.

I'm not advocating using Flash intros and all that crap, but the site could certainly use some redesigning and cleaning up.

I'm no HTML genius, but I figure there are plenty of 15-year old kids out there that Sklansky could pay a couple hundred bucks to do a nice design for the site. What do you think?

grandgnu · #2 03-13-2005, 07:42 PM

nt

Macdaddy Warsaw · #3 03-13-2005, 07:42 PM

The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

wacki · #4 03-13-2005, 07:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

smoore · #5 03-13-2005, 08:12 PM

There is very little design to this site, it's basically just UBB with funny colors and some ads.

Dynasty · #6 03-13-2005, 08:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

That seems to fit in with Mason's philosophy of running 2+2: All substance, no (or very little) style.

ClaytonN · #7 03-13-2005, 08:15 PM

I don't expect updated graphics when I come here, and I don't expect to.

Dynasty · #8 03-13-2005, 08:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I don't expect updated graphics when I come here, and I don't expect to.

[/ QUOTE ]

You were a bit redundant in what you reduntantly said.

OtisTheMarsupial · #9 03-13-2005, 08:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
All substance... no style.

[/ QUOTE ]
'Cept in OOT - no substance.

Form follows function and the site DOES work, no matter how it looks. And work well it does.
Even midget kangaroos post here, it's so darn popular.
However, the site could certainly use an over-haul. It's not only ugly, it's also too busy.

my vote: Back-end seems to work just fine. (except the archive).
Front end needs a new do.

Ot to the is

ClaytonN · #10 03-13-2005, 11:08 PM

Crikey.

View Poll Results: Does your significant other mind poker?
She wants me to play so I can make us money	55	20.60%
She understands, I play as much as I want and she occasionally plays herself	46	17.23%
She understands it’s a hobby so she doesn’t mind and I play as much as I want; she never plays	55	20.60%
She doesn’t like it so I play without her knowing.	1	0.37%
She doesn’t like it, thus I limit my play.	35	13.11%
She doesn’t like it, so I don’t play at all.	0	0%
I don’t have a significant other now but plan on decreasing my play later	14	5.24%
I don’t have a significant other now but will only date/marry one who lets me play at will.	40	14.98%
Her BB/100 is 3.5 and she taught me how to 3 bet and isolate the maniac preflop then check raise the turn and get overcalls on the river; her favorite game is $1000/2000 7-stud HI LOW	21	7.87%
Voters: 267. You may not vote on this poll