2+2: How smart are YOU?

[Messy_Jesse]

I was just wondering where this forum falls on the intelligence meter. The only way I can think of to measure this with any degree of accuracy would be to vote on where your SAT score was. And I don't want to hear any bullshit about how they dont mean anything, etc., etc., yada yada... I know its not perfect, but they do correlate to intelligence to a certain degree. Anyways, here's the poll:

[citanul]

i don't know why exactly, but you annoy me.

citanul

[gumpzilla]

[ QUOTE ]
I was just wondering where this forum falls on the intelligence meter. The only way I can think of to measure this with any degree of accuracy would be to vote on where your SAT score was.

[/ QUOTE ]

Or you could, you know, read what various people on this forum write and try to determine which people seem capable of logical argument. Thoughtful, intelligent posts will correlate even better with intelligence, I bet.

[downtown]

Uh, my sister got a 1600 on her SAT, but she doesn't post here. Word.

[Messy_Jesse]

THe fact that you think you own this forum and are so cynical annoys me. You just seem like a sad person.

[citanul]

i don't think i own the forum.

i am mildly cynical.

i am not a sad person.

i echo the statement that perhaps instead of asking about SAT scores for intelligence, you could read people's content. it's usually pretty well correlated with intelligence too.

citanul

[The Don]

I think you are definetly overestimating the SAT scores of the posters on this forum. The 1300+ incriments are too small when compared to the 200 point gap in the 1100-1300 range which I think at least 75% of posters here would fall into. Also, I would have posted this in Psychology or something.

mildly cynical?

[Tea_Bagger]

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think i own the forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh...yes you do. Get a life.

[gumpzilla]

[ QUOTE ]
mildly cynical?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think cynical is even the right word. Blunt is better.