Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2005, 05:21 AM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Default Derrick Brooks

The thread about Ray Lewis made me remember one of my favorite arguments circa 2001.

I always felt that Derrick Brooks was a better player than Ray Lewis. Sure, his entrance dance (or lack there of) wasn't of RayRay's quality. And his trash talking left a lot to be desired.

The only 'skill' that Lewis hands-down beats Brooks in, IMO, is hitting. He hits harder than Brooks, no doubt.

Brooks was always overshadowed on his team by outspoken players like Sapp and Lynch.

Oh yeah, Lewis leads in leadership, too. I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that. I'll still take Brooks.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:32 AM
Wes ManTooth Wes ManTooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 349
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

[ QUOTE ]
entrance dance ... RayRay's quality

[/ QUOTE ]


I would definately not call it "quality". It looks like he has an unmentionable object suck up his unmentionable place.

I would still take Brooks as well
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:39 AM
sammysusar sammysusar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 46
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

defensive players are alot harder to annalyze than offensive player. i do know that ray lewis is the best self promoter in the league though. not that would take away from his skill.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:00 AM
FishHooks FishHooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 596
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

Derrick Brooks is good but I think an argument can be made that the TB scheme made him better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:09 AM
Wes ManTooth Wes ManTooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 349
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

[ QUOTE ]
Derrick Brooks is good but I think an argument can be made that the TB scheme made him better.

[/ QUOTE ]

same for ray lewis for the ravens
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:32 AM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 742
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

They were both great players in their primes (arguably Lewis is still there). But I think a middle linebacker can have a greater impact on a game than a weak-side linebacker in a 4-3. Whether it was talent or scheme, Lewis made more plays and, while coaches certainly seemed to respect Brooks greatly, I never heard them talking about him changing their entire gameplan like they did with Lewis.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:36 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

[ QUOTE ]
But I think a middle linebacker can have a greater impact on a game than a weak-side linebacker in a 4-3.

[/ QUOTE ]
If I said "LT?" would you say fine, he's the exception?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:38 AM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 742
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

[ QUOTE ]

If I said "LT?" would you say fine, he's the exception?

[/ QUOTE ]

He played in a 3-4.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2005, 12:20 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

You're right, I totally forgot that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2005, 08:35 PM
FishHooks FishHooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 596
Default Re: Derrick Brooks

Nope,he makes the team and the scheme better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.