I was wrong, you were right, but that's why i joined 2+2, 80K hands...

Previously I had argued that 10K hands was a fair demographic to judge one's capabilities. I recant, my 2+2 bretheren. Tonight I played hand number 80K of 30-60, and I have to say that I regret making that statement.

After 80K hands of 30-60, I have a win rate that I can't calculate because I dont have any sort of poker software to come up with a number that microscopic. In fact, I have no poker tracker or anything of the like, which will change upon completion of this post. Eighty thousand hands, and this is not a joke, (to some it will be) I have managed to gain less than one small bet.

Was I running good for the first 10K hands? Perhaps.

Have I been running bad lately? Yes

Has that had a significant impact on my game? Unfortunately, the answer here is yes, too.

Did I really lose $9,000 in the last 16 days and not book a single winning session? Yeah, and even piss poor players dont do that....


So, I stand before you, beaten and war torn, in submission.

I never thought I would say this, but alas pride is the deadly sin in poker, I was wrong.

From hereforth I will listen and take into account, and not dismiss and argue in futility.


I can't believe I've played 80K hands and havent even earned one [censored] [censored] ass small [censored] bet.


I'd like to thank those of you who are able to consistently beat the 30 games and higher who gave me the time of day in your replies.

I'm going back to 15-30....