|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
This is from late Friday night. The table had been short (4 handed I think) and was filling back up. Everyone is getting a little frisky on the button, but postflop play has been pretty solid. The villain in this hand, who's Party handle I do not recognize (it's an astronaut) has been playing very aggressive PF, and tends to attack on the turn. As a little twist, I'm going to show you his cards and keep mine hidden. I think the table sees me as a little too LAG PF, and way too LAG post-flop (checkraise bluff caps and such). I have shown down my fair share of winners, but most of those have been played very passively.
Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (6 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is Button with 2 cards. BB holds 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls. Flop: (4.50 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, BB calls. Turn: (5.25 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, BB calls. River: (11.25 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Hero calls. Final Pot: 15.25 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
In white:
<font color="white">I'll go with KJ. K2 is a remote possibility, but just about any other hand would have been played poorly by you.</font> |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
Wookie
1) no 2) usually. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
Usually, as in, you usually play badly?
Actually, there's one more hand that you might have played properly, again in white: <font color="white"> Ducks. </font> Edited for typo. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
Usually, as in, you usually play badly? Actually, there's one more hand that you might have playd properly, again in white: <font color="white"> Ducks. </font> [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I usually play poorly. Come on, you've had me to your right at a 2+2 table. As for the other, NH sir. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
Based on the flop and turn 3-bets, I have you AA, KK, or JJ. The river call makes me think AA; of course, I don't see BB raising on a wheel draw either, so you could still have JJ or KK.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
Based on the flop and turn 3-bets, I have you AA, KK, or JJ. The river call makes me think AA; of course, I don't see BB raising on a wheel draw either, so you could still have JJ or KK. [/ QUOTE ] The BB thinks I'm a jackass and have quite literally 2 cards. He's not raising the flop on a wheel draw, he's raising a made hand. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
The river call makes me think AA [/ QUOTE ] Really? Cuz that makes me think he had a flush draw and a pair somewhere and it didnt come in, doesn't really fit though. Trips for you makes some sense on the early streets, but River doesn't make much sense, meh. I'll go with 22, KJ, AA or QQ, those seem solid possibilities. For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. [/ QUOTE ] If I'm capable of a continuation bet / bluff 3-bet on the flop, are you capping? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. [/ QUOTE ] If I'm capable of a continuation bet / bluff 3-bet on the flop, are you capping? [/ QUOTE ] Well, it all ties in with Pre-flop. I three bet a 2+2er here most of the time. That flop is pretty bad for me, If I am behind I am drawing to 2 outs, putting any extra money in when we are this behind is really costly. It's apparent that to get this hand to Showdown I'm going to have to call 2 more BBs, and to win if I'm ahead I have to dodge a million Overcards. I'll fold to your 3-bet. |
|
|