Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2004, 01:06 AM
Hedge Henderson Hedge Henderson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tejas
Posts: 64
Default NLHE: Starting at a Short-Handed Table

The standard tourney advice is tight early, aggressive later on and it's done pretty well for me so far. In our home game, we've played a few tourneys but all of the previous ones were at a single table. Thanks to television and networking, we're seeing more people interested in playing with us.

I don't want to give up too much EV short-handed by playing tight early, but part of my game depends on being able to steal blinds later on when poker gets expensive. Payout is pretty flat. Blinds are structured for a slow start and a quick finish. Players are (mostly) loose-passive and I've played with a good number of them week after week. What adjustments should I make for a tourney that starts with two tables of six or two tables of seven vs. a single ten-player table?

Any advice would be appreciated. I do have a reputation to uphold among a select group.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2004, 01:50 AM
CrisBrown CrisBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,493
Default Re: NLHE: Starting at a Short-Handed Table

Hi Hedge,

The obvious point is that hands like middle pairs, AQ-AT, and KQ-KT go up in value at a short-handed table, because with fewer hands dealt it's less likely that there's a big pair or a monster out there.

There's doubtless a precise, mathematical process you could use, but my general sense is that for each two people short of a full table, you can "bump" a pair or a kicker up one rank. E.g.: at an 8-handed table, you're probably safe in playing JJ as if it were QQ, or AQ as if it were AK. At a 6-handed table, you're probably safe in playing TT as if it were QQ, or AJ as if it were AK.

But again, that's a very general sense that I have at the table, and of course it can't replace specific reads on a specific player's action.

Cris
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2004, 06:20 PM
Hedge Henderson Hedge Henderson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tejas
Posts: 64
Default Re: NLHE: Starting at a Short-Handed Table

Thanks, amigo.

Drawing on my short-handed NL ring game experience, I was able to adjust a little faster than the other players. All my good hands came early, though. I saw AA, KK, QQ, TT, in just the first ten hands. Folded the cowboys to a big bet on a turn ace, won the blinds plus a little more with the others. Ended up second out of 14 players.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2004, 06:43 PM
Che Che is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 229
Default Re: NLHE: Starting at a Short-Handed Table

Cris-

Does the "bump up" hold for post-flop play? Or does it only impact your preflop decision to play or fold a given hand?

For example, do you play AJ like TPTK on an A-rag-rag flop at a 6-handed table?

Thanks,
Che
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.