Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2005, 12:41 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

$60 Stars Turbo

UTG: (4575 in chips)
Button: (670 in chips)
bluefeet-SB: (1770 in chips)
BB: (6485 in chips)

All post the ante 25 - blinds 100/200 [going up in less than 1 minute]

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bluefeet [J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]]
UTG: calls 200
Button: folds
bluefeet: ???

Both BB & UTG had played EXTREMELY horrible - thus having all the chips [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

UTG was very loose. Taking in most flops, calling PF and post-flop with a random assortment of hands. He was lacking in open aggression (thus the constant limping).

His neighbor took on more of the true LAG type. Having pushed over a 3x of mine an orbit or two earlier. Amassing his furtune with a couple ugly suckouts (AI PF).

So...we get this gem. Shortie has passed on a couple open opportunities - in no big hurry to hang himself.

FWIW, I moved the button one, pushing into the biggie blinds here...netting a .+2 based on the range I gave them (22+,A5+,KJs+,KQ+).

What's your move?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2005, 12:46 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

jam jam jam

Edit: ok you probably want some real strategy. UTG probably has a hand that he wants to get HU against the shorty with but probably isn't that strong. And you'd love to get in as a 70% fav here even with the shorties stack size. 99 I would play more passively, TT is a really tough spot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2005, 12:46 PM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

I complete and play it passively. I'm willing to get pushed off by any overcard or any board that I think might be beat me. The problem is letting BB play and not knowing at all where you're at.

Ill play it for my stack with an undercard flop (most of them) or a set only.

I think pushing here is also ok, but its close (as you said, and if they play horribly, a call is more likely so pushing=bad)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2005, 12:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

real rough spot and is uber read-dependent.

with no reads, i push this lots. with your read, i might just complete and play some poker.

EDIT: *** just reread my reply... by "play some poker" i probably should have said "push or fold depending on the flop."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2005, 01:19 PM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

Bluefeet, I think I'd have to push this. Shorty isn't uber short. If he doubles up, he's not that far behind you. This is hardly a spot where you can just fold ITM. Plus, you still have some FE and of course, an excellent hand.

Another reason that I can see to push is that if it gets folded to shorty, he is to your right - you of course can expect him to push into your BB at his first opportunity. He's not short enough for you to play passively here.

I usually take a more conservative approach (you have to ITM before you can finish first) but this really is a great chance to double up if the loose UTG does decide to call. So I push, regardless of the nature of my opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-19-2005, 01:26 PM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

[ QUOTE ]
Bluefeet, I think I'd have to push this. Shorty isn't uber short. If he doubles up, he's not that far behind you. This is hardly a spot where you can just fold ITM. Plus, you still have some FE and of course, an excellent hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

The thing is, if Hero had a little less and/or shorty a little more, then I would absolutely agree. But with the stacks the way they are, blinds going to 200/400 plus antes on the next hand, and Hero's reads on the biggins, this becomes a very borderline push.

I definitely would not argue with anyone advocating a push here, but I think there's something to be said for both lines.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-19-2005, 01:50 PM
sofere sofere is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 118
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

I don't think this is all that borderline. Even with your read on BS, you still have a good amount of fold equity here, and your destroying a lot of the hands he might call with. The fact that blinds are going up soon gives me more reason to push this as you'll lose almost all fold equity when they do and would thus be playing to limp into third.

IMO...you have way too much fold equity to not push here, the extra 500 in chips is very valuable, and you're a big favorite to double up if called.

FWIW, I probably fold this if UTG pushes.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-19-2005, 02:27 PM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think this is all that borderline. Even with your read on BS, you still have a good amount of fold equity here, and your destroying a lot of the hands he might call with. The fact that blinds are going up soon gives me more reason to push this as you'll lose almost all fold equity when they do and would thus be playing to limp into third.

IMO...you have way too much fold equity to not push here, the extra 500 in chips is very valuable, and you're a big favorite to double up if called.

FWIW, I probably fold this if UTG pushes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno...I think this is where ICM becomes very important and where the correct play shocks your intuition. There are some stack distributions where doubling up is clearly correct and some where playing for third is clearly correct. This, in mind, leans toward the latter.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-19-2005, 02:30 PM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think this is all that borderline. Even with your read on BS, you still have a good amount of fold equity here, and your destroying a lot of the hands he might call with. The fact that blinds are going up soon gives me more reason to push this as you'll lose almost all fold equity when they do and would thus be playing to limp into third.

IMO...you have way too much fold equity to not push here, the extra 500 in chips is very valuable, and you're a big favorite to double up if called.

FWIW, I probably fold this if UTG pushes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno...I think this is where ICM becomes very important and where the correct play shocks your intuition. There are some stack distributions where doubling up is clearly correct and some where playing for third is clearly correct. This, in mind, leans toward the latter.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. He has 670, not 200. It's not like he's totally wasted. Bluefeet ran a scenario that tried to mock this one, and IMO even that scenario, which was +EV, understates our EV. I shove.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-19-2005, 02:31 PM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: ($60) sure, NOW i get JJ

[ QUOTE ]
I dunno...I think this is where ICM becomes very important and where the correct play shocks your intuition. There are some stack distributions where doubling up is clearly correct and some where playing for third is clearly correct. This, in mind, leans toward the latter.

[/ QUOTE ]

But we're not even talking about responding to a raise. Just an UTG limp. And the shortstack is not SO short that he is no threat to catch up with you.

So, say you call (now we're down to 1570) and fold to an over on the flop. Shorty doubles up once, he's got ~1340 chips. Our lead on him is almost gone.

By pushing, you're playing for 1st AND simultaneously playing to ITM. I'd never forgive myself if I played this hand weakly and ended up not finishing ITM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.