|
|
#11
12-14-2005, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I don't shut it down like a lot of people at the bubble. My ratio (only about 200 SNGs to date) is about 35:25:22:22. I'm not sure if I can keep that up over the long run. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that you get top 4 finishes 104% of the time? I Think that might be unsustainable, and it really isn't about your measley sample size. 
|
|
#13
12-14-2005, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
I seem to be 3rd > 1st > 2nd so far. Am I just playing too passively ITM? I think I might be play "over"aggressive and pushing almost everything and calling almost every all in with a LARGE chip lead and high blinds. Standard? Probably also too tight 4 left where I'll fold hands like A8, KJ, etc if 4th is getting low stacked.
|
|
#14
12-16-2005, 03:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
I seem to be 3rd > 1st > 2nd so far. Am I just playing too passively ITM? I think I might be play "over"aggressive and pushing almost everything and calling almost every all in with a LARGE chip lead and high blinds. Standard? Probably also too tight 4 left where I'll fold hands like A8, KJ, etc if 4th is getting low stacked. [/ QUOTE ] it seems likely that you're trying to squeak ITM.
|
|
#15
12-16-2005, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
Yeah, do you advocate just being a total bully with a lot of chips on the bubble? And pushing a lot of strong hands with 4 left if are currently in 3rd, but have a good shot to double up?
|
|
#17
12-16-2005, 03:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] That would mean all thirds and zero firsts and seconds. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#18
12-16-2005, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] That would mean all thirds and zero firsts and seconds. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] yes
|
|
#19
12-16-2005, 04:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] Uh...no. That's only if you give a [censored] about variance. ROI is ROI. Who cares about ITM? [censored] ITM
|
|
#20
12-16-2005, 04:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ideal ratio of 1st : 2nd : 3rd finishes?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For a given ROI, the best distribution is one which produces the highest ITM. [/ QUOTE ] Uh...no. That's only if you give a [censored] about variance. ROI is ROI. Who cares about ITM? [censored] ITM [/ QUOTE ] I give a huge [censored] about variance! Low variance = high sanity.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
