Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-03-2004, 03:25 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

I don't think I have enough data to make statistically significant separations. I do tend to have worse results on days I play more, but this is probably due to the fact that I often shorten my lucky days.

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-03-2004, 07:50 PM
t_perkin t_perkin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Iceland - back in England soon!
Posts: 532
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

I posted once on the games being tougher just after new year (people's poker new years resolutions?)
I don't think anyone else agreed with me at the time, glad to see that I wasn't completely off my rocker tho..

Tim

p.s: Get MS Excel and learn how to use pivot tables - it is truly awesome, you will pay for it in time saved very quickly. (assuming you do more than a few simple graphs once a year [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img])
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-04-2004, 01:46 AM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

Also the WPT new season started sometime closer to lat january.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-04-2004, 02:16 AM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default This past month tough?

[ QUOTE ]
Mostly game selection: these occurred around jan 1, where the games were a bit tougher.

Craig

[/ QUOTE ]

Speaking of which, did anyone else find the month of April to be tougher than the last several months?

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-04-2004, 03:56 AM
Stoneii Stoneii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Co.Down, N.Ireland
Posts: 220
Default Re: This past month tough?

My worst ever has been April-May

stoneii
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-04-2004, 04:10 AM
m-set m-set is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

Hi Bozeman

Thanks for posting this - it gives us newbies something to shoot for.

Do you want to reveal how much of a starting bankroll you took into this effort? I notice that thankfully, you didn't experience a drawdown right out of the gate.

Also, were these games played at Party? I have been trying the low buy-in ( $10 and $20) SNG single tables at Party, but I find it way way different than Stars, due to the short stack we start out with, and the faster blind increases. I heard that at Party, the higher limit SNG games provide each player with 1000 to start. I find my variation is way higher due to these short starting stacks.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-05-2004, 05:28 AM
William Wilson William Wilson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 38
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

Also, could you tell us at what level you started and what your criteria was for moving up or down?

Cool post.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-05-2004, 12:21 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s

I started, several years ago, at UB at $5 (with a buyin of $100), quickly moved to $10, found that Paradise games were much easier, moved up through 20 and 30 to fifty (I didnt stay at 30 long because I found the players at 50 easier to read). I moved up when I felt I was the best player at a typical table, and that I wasn't a weak player at the next level. I also played a fair number of MTT's (including live).

At this point I spent most of my bankroll on a trip. (I had found Party by this time, but I felt Paradise was better because of 1000 vs 800 chips and about one extra level). After the trip, my bankroll was under $500, so I played $30's to get it to ~$600 and then moved back up to 50. When Party changed their 50+'s to 1000 chips, I moved over there (at this point MTT variance was getting to me, so I started playing more SnG's). A short time at the 50's and a look at the play at the 100's convinced me to try them (coupled with the nice run I had at the start). I don't remember what my bankroll was at that time, but it was around $5k.

YMMV,
Craig
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.