#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
I don't think I have enough data to make statistically significant separations. I do tend to have worse results on days I play more, but this is probably due to the fact that I often shorten my lucky days.
Craig |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
I posted once on the games being tougher just after new year (people's poker new years resolutions?)
I don't think anyone else agreed with me at the time, glad to see that I wasn't completely off my rocker tho.. Tim p.s: Get MS Excel and learn how to use pivot tables - it is truly awesome, you will pay for it in time saved very quickly. (assuming you do more than a few simple graphs once a year [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Also the WPT new season started sometime closer to lat january.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
This past month tough?
[ QUOTE ]
Mostly game selection: these occurred around jan 1, where the games were a bit tougher. Craig [/ QUOTE ] Speaking of which, did anyone else find the month of April to be tougher than the last several months? eastbay |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This past month tough?
My worst ever has been April-May
stoneii |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Hi Bozeman
Thanks for posting this - it gives us newbies something to shoot for. Do you want to reveal how much of a starting bankroll you took into this effort? I notice that thankfully, you didn't experience a drawdown right out of the gate. Also, were these games played at Party? I have been trying the low buy-in ( $10 and $20) SNG single tables at Party, but I find it way way different than Stars, due to the short stack we start out with, and the faster blind increases. I heard that at Party, the higher limit SNG games provide each player with 1000 to start. I find my variation is way higher due to these short starting stacks. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Also, could you tell us at what level you started and what your criteria was for moving up or down?
Cool post. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
I started, several years ago, at UB at $5 (with a buyin of $100), quickly moved to $10, found that Paradise games were much easier, moved up through 20 and 30 to fifty (I didnt stay at 30 long because I found the players at 50 easier to read). I moved up when I felt I was the best player at a typical table, and that I wasn't a weak player at the next level. I also played a fair number of MTT's (including live).
At this point I spent most of my bankroll on a trip. (I had found Party by this time, but I felt Paradise was better because of 1000 vs 800 chips and about one extra level). After the trip, my bankroll was under $500, so I played $30's to get it to ~$600 and then moved back up to 50. When Party changed their 50+'s to 1000 chips, I moved over there (at this point MTT variance was getting to me, so I started playing more SnG's). A short time at the 50's and a look at the play at the 100's convinced me to try them (coupled with the nice run I had at the start). I don't remember what my bankroll was at that time, but it was around $5k. YMMV, Craig |
|
|