#1
|
|||
|
|||
Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Since I have now moved up to $215, I thought I'd post results for all the $109 SnG's I've played.
Bankroll progression: Place probability: ROI seems to be approaching a constant. Note that after 100 I had a significantly different ROI. FWIW, Craig |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Cool man, that's informative. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Nice results. Your ROI is very solid.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Very nice.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is it from Party Poker or some other site?
Is it from Party Poker or some other site?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Did you ever answer me when you first posted your charts months ago what program you used for the charting?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
In games 100-240, there is a noticeable plateau. Did you consciously make any strategy adjustments to get either into or out of that plateau?
eastbay |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Have you tried splitting this buy Time of Day, start/middle/end of session or day of the week?
I would be interested to see. if you can be bothered.... Tim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
I use MicrosoftWorksSpreadsheet, even though it sucks.
Craig |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
Mostly game selection: these occurred around jan 1, where the games were a bit tougher. I was a bit too tight on the bubble, and this was a still a statistically possible random fluctuation.
Craig |
|
|