#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
Whatever Bugstud. It was off the top of my head and I don't care what the blinds are...
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
[ QUOTE ]
$.50 is raked from a pot of $41648. [/ QUOTE ] Hhhmmmmm. I know its HU, but still! I noticed party is taking 5$ from their new 1-2 games also, those bastards! Im sure everyone that plays in that game has a sweet RB deal anyways... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
Now that hurts!! Prahlad's variance must be all over the place. I don't know how they do it. Well, yes I do. Like Matusow said, you can't have any respect or thought about money.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
Mr Jones just took 30K+ off Mahatma HU. FYI. Railbirds, attack.
Edit: 50K+. Really sick. Edit2: Two full houses later Mahatma is only down 12K when Jones calls massive overbets on both hands to double SR up each time. Can you say variance? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
Oh well, it was fun while it lasted. Mahatma goes home with all the money. Ends the match up 7K.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Indian Head vs Mahatma Hu
Interesting, there were about 80K on the table, and Mahatma was up only 7K. If we take out 20K they brought at the start, so overall he brougth 53K more to the table...
Does it mean Mahatma was dominated and just got lucky (Jones was risking less than 2 buy-ins and Mahatma more than 6)? Or an opposite, he was running cold, still his skill won him some money... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|