Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:45 PM
Gramps Gramps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oaktown
Posts: 124
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

[ QUOTE ]
If you actually watched that game then you know the Raiders should have won.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and if you watched that game, you would have seen it was the Raiders playing, and would have factored in that they've been the best team in the NFL over the last dozen years of finding a way to lose games that they have a chance to win. That game vs. the Chiefs was no exception and no surprise.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:31 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

[ QUOTE ]
Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

Too early to tell if it's really "Chiefs still suck in Denver"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:34 PM
sublime sublime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 681
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

t they've been the best team in the NFL over the last dozen years of finding a way to lose games that they have a chance to win.

what does 12 (or even 3) years ago have to do with last night?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:42 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

He's assuming an institutional affliction. Whether that's true or not is a moot point.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:56 PM
sublime sublime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 681
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

[ QUOTE ]
He's assuming an institutional affliction. Whether that's true or not is a moot point.

[/ QUOTE ]

oh, i know what he was assuming. i was just surprised that anyone would consider it a plausible factor.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-27-2005, 06:04 PM
Gramps Gramps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oaktown
Posts: 124
Default Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....

[ QUOTE ]
oh, i know what he was assuming. i was just surprised that anyone would consider it a plausible factor.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mostly just a retort to that, "If the Raiders had just done __ and ___" and KC hadn't elimnated any of their mistakes, then.... bemoaning (which is valid to some extent, but not at all jiving with the facetious tone of my first post).

Though if the Raiders have made some solid offseason acquisitions (i.e., a certain WR and RB) that has the O/U on their season win total inflated a bit (given their continuing weaknesses in certain areas and tough schedule), then maybe it is something to factor in...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.