Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-30-2005, 01:31 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

TOP PAIR GOOD KICKER RAISE RAISE RAISE RAISE RAISE FLOP AF = 3.0 TAG TAG TAG WE HAVE THE BEST HAND SOMETIMES AND IF WE DON'T HE WILL PUNISH US AND WE WILL CALL DOWN AND IF WE DO HE WILL FOLD YEAH THATS HOW WE SHOULD PLAY THIS HAND
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-30-2005, 01:51 PM
deception5 deception5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

Are you thinking that this player won't bet 99/TT/QQ on the river after we check behind? Or that based on the size of the pot, the likely hand distribution, and the likelyhood of one of those hands checking that we are too likely behind when he bets to call a river bet unimproved?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-30-2005, 02:08 PM
deucesevenoff deucesevenoff is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

Just as a question...why hasn't anybody suggested raising the flop? It seems to me as though KK, QQ and JJ would also three bet pre flop and then (perhaps?) follow up with a continuation bet despite the ace on board. Nobody has even brought this up so sorry if I'm missing something basic. Just wanted to throw it out there.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-30-2005, 02:10 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

[ QUOTE ]
Just as a question...why hasn't anybody suggested three betting the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm pretty sure that suggestion was ignored because it's impossible. i could be wrong though. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-30-2005, 02:13 PM
deception5 deception5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

[ QUOTE ]
Just as a question...why hasn't anybody suggested three betting the flop? It seems to me as though KK, QQ and JJ would also three bet pre flop and then (perhaps?) follow up with a continuation bet despite the ace on board. Nobody has even brought this up so sorry if I'm missing something basic. Just wanted to throw it out there.

[/ QUOTE ]

As far as raising the flop, think about the effect a raise would have on KK/QQ and whether or not that is good or bad.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-30-2005, 02:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

Grunch: I think the fold is fine. Based upon what you saw (though a small sample), I think Villain has a set or 2-pair. I don't think you have enough outs to call in this small pot if behind.

I think you played PF well, though I guess some might argue you should fold even AQo against ultra-tight player 3-betting (I don't agree, and think you don't have enough info on this player yet anyhow to make that kind of fold PF). On the flop, however, I'm torn between calling (is this a WA/WB situation?) or raising, but I think the latter to find out where I am before I get, say, check-raised on the more expensive street.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-30-2005, 02:23 PM
deucesevenoff deucesevenoff is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

miles- yeah sorry...just edited my post. I meant raising the flop not three betting.

deception- Does it have anything to do with encouraging KK and QQ to continue betting into us on the turn when he only has two outs? Seems sort of like the WA/WB (check/call-check/call-bet) line, just with a much larger kicker than we'd usually have when we take this line. Use it cause he's a tight player who three bet preflop?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-30-2005, 03:20 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

[ QUOTE ]
TOP PAIR GOOD KICKER RAISE RAISE RAISE RAISE RAISE FLOP AF = 3.0 TAG TAG TAG WE HAVE THE BEST HAND SOMETIMES AND IF WE DON'T HE WILL PUNISH US AND WE WILL CALL DOWN AND IF WE DO HE WILL FOLD YEAH THATS HOW WE SHOULD PLAY THIS HAND

[/ QUOTE ]

Well,

FINE THEN, I'M WRONG. JEEZ.

Num Lock = What the heck does it do?
Caps Lock = Don't be a jerk.
Punctuation = invented for a reason. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-30-2005, 03:23 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

[ QUOTE ]

Num Lock = What the heck does it do?


[/ QUOTE ]

Activates the numerical keys on the right of the keyboard [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-30-2005, 03:30 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ under fire, ok to let go?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Num Lock = What the heck does it do?


[/ QUOTE ]

Activates the numerical keys on the right of the keyboard [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Why, so it does. I'm sure on my last keyboard it didn't do anything though. Or am I just crazy?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.